There are companies that put a lot of effort into QA before each product goes out the door. They know that there stuff is good and generally have a warranty for a year or two just in case something gets by. Then, there are the companies that do a rudimentary bit of QA and are more than happy to let the customers do the final testing. These are the companies that tend to offer a lifetime warranty. They know that some of there stuff is off and if they stuck people with crap guns that didn't work, they's lose in the end. Both are valid ways to handle the QA for a pistol in that the higher end companies can command a decent price and the lower end companies can get the products out cheaper.
RIA puts out a lot of guns and it's sad to see that they are still cranking out a lemon from time to time. I have no idea if it's one in a thousand or every third gun, but they do seem to stand behind them. It will be interesting to hear of what you find on this one CM. Hopefully, it's just an odd tolerance stack that works against the gun and not something fundamental like the angle of the ramp cut or other non-repairable issue.
RIA puts out a lot of guns and it's sad to see that they are still cranking out a lemon from time to time. I have no idea if it's one in a thousand or every third gun, but they do seem to stand behind them. It will be interesting to hear of what you find on this one CM. Hopefully, it's just an odd tolerance stack that works against the gun and not something fundamental like the angle of the ramp cut or other non-repairable issue.