You're the one who brought Locke into itOh. So the particular principle of enlightenment you're implying here is God hates fags?
I'm more encouraged by Tom's Christianity.
You're the one who brought Locke into itOh. So the particular principle of enlightenment you're implying here is God hates fags?
I'm more encouraged by Tom's Christianity.
That’s not a rebutal.You're the one who brought Locke into it
Sorry.Get a room
I didn’t mean it like that. Act has a point. That’s all. We’ve strayed pretty far from the topic.I get that.
There is now, no room for conservative Christian opinions in our society.
Well, my point was that you and bug go round and round.I didn’t mean it like that. Act has a point. That’s all. We’ve strayed pretty far from the topic.
Perhaps you should include the temporal component - you know, so your thinking isn't so binary/two dimensionalThat’s not a rebutal.
Sexist. It can be any one of the 87 genders!Well, my point was that you and bug go round and round.
If it were a man and woman, I would say it's sexual tension.
Cool. Supporting an obviously mentally defective person, operating under the delusion they are a woman despite possessing XY genetics, is driven by misplaced social justice concerns and de facto insane - so, fits the categoryThis is the insane social Justice thread. Prolly should just get back to that.
Sexist. It can be any one of the 87 genders!
Jeez
Now some people either don't know where milk comes from, or thinks ideology trumps biology.