That's why I refer to everyone as, "that mother******."
All inclusive.
That's why I refer to everyone as, "that mother******."
All inclusive.
It most certainly is not. By definition, to perform that action upon a “mother”, one must have a particular part in *his* anatomy. Anyone attempting the act absent the referenced appendage is merely “toying” with the mother (aka birthing parent) in question.That's why I refer to everyone as, "that mother******."
All inclusive.
Well my wife and I belong to each other...It most certainly is not. By definition, to perform that action upon a “mother”, one must have a particular part in *his* anatomy. Anyone attempting the act absent the referenced appendage is merely “toying” with the mother (aka birthing parent) in question.
I am reminded of the old rhyme: A m*****f***er I might be, but the mother I’m f***ing don’t belong to me!”
All references in this post have been SWIDT scrutinized.
Blessings,
Bill
No, they would be the appropriate pronoun in his sentence.They? You didn't use "they", you used "somebody". You could say "they" if you don't know. But when referring to one person, "they" is acceptable informally. The definitions didn't used to have the bit about 3rd person singular even though people sometimes used it informally.
That's why I refer to everyone as, "that mother******."
All inclusive.
Long story short, in Australia, the north is looked down on like the Louisiana bayou is here. Big city politician starts ripping on northern territory AG for being a racist white old man. AG, who is in fact a not especially old woman of aboriginal descent rips on the politician for being a freaking moron.
No disagreement here.It seems similar to how most from Louisiana have more common sense and decency than most yankees....
Depends. Louisiana is similar to Missippi culture. “Common sense and decency” is hit or miss. I ran into some really, extraordinarily good people there. I ran into about as many extraordinarily bad people. Respectful? Always. “Yes sir Mr jamil. We can do that for you.” As they **** me over.It seems similar to how most from Louisiana have more common sense and decency than most yankees....
Eh. I suspect their desire to see America wiped out has more to do with what they see as fulfillment of prophesy. They hate Israel, America is a powerful supporter of Israel. Both are infidels. And it’s not really a lot more complicated than that.It makes you wonder if radical Muslims are justified in their desire to see America wiped out.
Their morals are not far off from those of Christians, but we have that wishy washy TOLERANCE DOCTRINE.
Almost sounds like being wistful for another round of inquisitions.It makes you wonder if radical Muslims are justified in their desire to see America wiped out.
Their morals are not far off from those of Christians, but we have that wishy washy TOLERANCE DOCTRINE.
This puts some of us on the horns of a dilemma. We believe in freedom. We also believe on God. All I can say is that some people ard really going to be hating life when God is running the inquisition without human assistance.Almost sounds like being wistful for another round of inquisitions.
No, the reason for tolerance is that it is not our job to pass judgement.Almost sounds like being wistful for another round of inquisitions.