The Funny Pic Thread, Pt. 8

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    9,381
    113
    Texas
    Well, when the power goes out those old school phones still work. Nothing wrong with keeping one around.

    I wish I still had the one we had in the house when I was growing up. Just like the yellow and green ones in the picture, in basic black tho. And yes it was a party line, had to check for others before dialing.

    I don't have a landline anymore so I could not hook it up, but I could still use the hand set as a weapon...:)
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,362
    113
    Merrillville
    Feminism has really never taken hold in Russia for some reason.

    d3HVCzW.jpg

    One of my favorite memes.
     

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Well, when the power goes out those old school phones still work. Nothing wrong with keeping one around.

    You need a gizmo that turns clicks into beeps to get it to work with the phone company. I just installed an old ringer in my house. We use Google Voice and an adapter device for the VOIP.
     

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Mother Jones published an article based upon a damning internal memo from Ford and used the article to apply pressure to the NHTSA. The NHTSA at first resisted the pressure, sticking to its normal procedures regarding recalls, but eventually acquiesced and started recall proceedings in an accelerated fashion and set up a test that, while not really rigged and not involving explosives, went far beyond how small cars were normally crash tested at the time, making it more likely to create a fire. For instance, they filled the tank to the brim with gas, switched the headlights on, used a higher speed and used an impact vehicle with a sharper front rather than a flat barrier. They got their fire.

    That being said, it all started with Ford's own words.

    https://www.autosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/import/phpq3mJ7F_FordMemo.pdf

    cost.png


    The cost of saving an estimated 180 burn deaths, 180 serious burn injuries and 2100 injuries was $137 million, the benefit was saving $49.5 million in payouts to families. The conclusion of this memo was that implementing an $11.00 per vehicle fix would not yield a reasonable benefit, so the fix was not voluntarily implemented.

    That is probably a standard memo for every vehicle. I imagine that if you looked you could find one for each vehicle at every manufacturer.

    The Chargers were particularly bad in a rear collision, as the fill door for the gas tank is very near to the drivers head and would douse the driver with fuel (no sealing caps back then) before setting them on fire.
     
    Last edited:

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,195
    149
    Valparaiso
    That is probably a standard memo for every vehicle. I imagine that if you looked you could find one for each vehicle at every manufacturer...

    That may well be true and I have no reason to doubt it. However, the public doesn't react well to companies knowing of a specific risk...of death by fire and severe burns, especially, then concluding that $11 per vehicle is a better bet than paying off widows and other family members.
     

    Doug

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    69   0   0
    Sep 5, 2008
    6,630
    149
    Indianapolis
    That may well be true and I have no reason to doubt it. However, the public doesn't react well to companies knowing of a specific risk...of death by fire and severe burns, especially, then concluding that $11 per vehicle is a better bet than paying off widows and other family members.

    The above may well be true and I have no reason to doubt it. However the same types of decisions will be made about vaccinations for children and health care for all under one-payer socialized medicine. The difference is that there is a financial incentive for refusing treatment and allowing suffering and death.

    Fools refuse to believe this and socialist leaning media won't report it. Some of the problems in the British system: https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapo...rgery-due-to-budget-constraints/#588cc8163b99

    I am aware of similar sub-standard treatment in the Veterans Administration Health Care system.
     

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    That may well be true and I have no reason to doubt it. However, the public doesn't react well to companies knowing of a specific risk...of death by fire and severe burns, especially, then concluding that $11 per vehicle is a better bet than paying off widows and other family members.

    There is a video of a very young Michael Moore (supposedly) going after Milton Friedman about this issue. Friedman counters with the question, "how much should be spent on safety?" His point is that you will always get to the place where additional money invested to improve safety just isn't worth the lives it may or may not save. Is that evil? I think that everyone assumes a certain amount of risk in everything they do. The big question is, where do you draw the line?

    We have Failure Mode Calculations that we do at work. Invariably they all lead to the engine catching fire, the plan crashing, and everyone dying. We do our best to mitigate the risk of these failure modes, but nothing is full proof.

    My argument has always been, "show me one other car from that era built differently." Every single one had the fuel tank between the bumper and the axle, and most didn't have it partitioned from the cabin with a firewall. The only thing separating most motorists from a gruesome death in the '70s was about 2 inches of cheap foam.
     

    Jerchap2

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2013
    7,867
    83
    Central Indiana
    A 60 second commercial from 1966. I remember it. Click to play if you like. Made me laugh. Those were different times.

    [video=facebook_share;1968839006713410]https://www.facebook.com/classictelevisioncommercials/videos/1968839006713410/[/video]
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,352
    113
    NWI
    I must not be very evolved. Now a days all we have is the Victoria's Secret fashion show. Which, by the way, I do not watch.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom