Courts do not have any oversight. It is an unconstitutional line of legal attack over what the courts are to do, including prescribing the manner electors are chosen. Their role is to interpret what the legislature directed, not create laws.One other thing about ISL. It asserts state legislators have sole authority over voting policy, including courts. I agree with it that the state's legislative body gets to make laws about state election policies, and that governors and state officials cannot supersede that.
But to say courts don't have oversight is flat out wrong. If that were the case, who could stop an activist partisan legislature from overtly disfavoring one party over the other?
The voters are the constitutional authority to stop an activist partisan legislature.
This is not rocket science, just read and study the constitution and it will reveal the way…