Bob, I'm not trying to "win" this conversation. I'm trying to decide if I should change how I practice.
Right now I drop my main gun if I have to quickly transition to my bug. I also think it is reasonable to have people drop their loaded handgun intentionally to help them get over the urge to try to catch their handgun if they fumble their draw.
I guess that point hits kind of close to home with me as one time I lost my grip on a handgun and "juggled it" trying to catch it. Trying to catch the gun was not safe at all and it made an impression on me that I needed to break myself of trying. I posted the videos to see if people's objection was to dropping the gun at all, dropping the loaded gun, or just Yeager. I also posted the Southnarc .pdf because he does not teach to drop the gun while drawing the bug and he seems to make sense in what he does.
Bob, I'm not trying to "win" this conversation. I'm trying to decide if I should change how I practice.
Right now I drop my main gun if I have to quickly transition to my bug. I also think it is reasonable to have people drop their loaded handgun intentionally to help them get over the urge to try to catch their handgun if they fumble their draw.
I guess that point hits kind of close to home with me as one time I lost my grip on a handgun and "juggled it" trying to catch it. Trying to catch the gun was not safe at all and it made an impression on me that I needed to break myself of trying. I posted the videos to see if people's objection was to dropping the gun at all, dropping the loaded gun, or just Yeager. I also posted the Southnarc .pdf because he does not teach to drop the gun while drawing the bug and he seems to make sense in what he does.
When I was a lot younger I tried snow skiing. My first trip down the hill I fell and busted my butt at least a half dozen times before I reached the bottom of the bunny hill. I didn't need any practice learning to fall, it was just a natural instinct.
I won't need to purposely drop my EDC to know how to drop it.
Am I the only one that throws an emptied gun at the target?
I also think it is reasonable to have people drop their loaded handgun intentionally to help them get over the urge to try to catch their handgun if they fumble their draw.
TR is training people to do that.I was trained to have a plan and to implement that plan upon the conditions being met, and I did it instinctively when the conditions were met with no conscious thought on my part at all.
TR is training people to do that.
You may not agree with their methods but here's what many of you on this thread aren't considering - TR doesn't train, "how to avoid shooting yourself when removing your pistol from your holster when you poop." They're training how to fight with a firearm. That's a completely different set of goals and they've adjusted their curriculum accordingly.
A quick google search of your boy Tom Givens shows the first line, "After completing a 25-year career in law enforcement" (which we know differs from James Yeager's career) which means he's developed the mindset over the years of being accountable for his shots and his image in relation to firearms use. If he pulls his pistol he better be right. Yeager and 'nem aren't too concerned with that because they're fighting zombies.
The mindset development you speak of is (for lack of a better term) a completely different school of thought. When LEOs can sit in a classroom for numerous hours a year and talk about the psychology of shooting and the physiology involved, the cultural stigmas, the related actions required they tend to drift toward "good citizen shoots bad guy in self defense scenario." Since all the actual shooting training of that is done on a golf course or in a shoot house - a controlled environment - it's done with rigid safety standards in place because the mindset has already been developed. You don't play with guns... you only use them as a last resort and only when the bad guy leaves you no option.
Yeager and 'nem are playing zombie hunter in a post-apocalyptic fantasy land where law and order has broken down. (Might be Baghdad, might be 20 seconds at an ATM) They're taken someone who's most likely had ZERO training on high-risk scenario management and in the course of a day or two, training them to be ninja warriors.
I agree it can be safely done without a cameraman downrange. But that takes a lot more time and involvement on the student's part and typically, students don't have the financial backer to make that happen. They get one fly-away training opportunity every couple of years. The taxpayers don't pay for them to sit in class for hours on end.
Dude, you can make me laugh even sitting in the hospital!
Like what?Why did he do this outside a shooting bay also?
To Yeager's credit, his response video did have a couple of good points.
Dude, you can make me laugh even sitting in the hospital!
oh, well that's cool then!By the way, I'm not going to go back and find it, but the gif posted upthread of the guy with the AK is Sonny Puzikas. He is a friend of Yeager's, and holds the distinction of actually having shot one of his students.
Edit: another instructor, not a student, was shot. My mistake.
And there you go......
I bet you'll never look at a snowcone the same again.
Hopefully I can unremember it at some point!I bet you'll never look at a snowcone the same again.
You are fortunate that it came naturally to you. I was not very good at falling and I have spent hours being instructed how to fall and practicing it.
TR is training people to do that.
You may not agree with their methods but here's what many of you on this thread aren't considering - TR doesn't train, "how to avoid shooting yourself when removing your pistol from your holster when you poop." They're training how to fight with a firearm. That's a completely different set of goals and they've adjusted their curriculum accordingly.
A quick google search of your boy Tom Givens shows the first line, "After completing a 25-year career in law enforcement" (which we know differs from James Yeager's career) which means he's developed the mindset over the years of being accountable for his shots and his image in relation to firearms use. If he pulls his pistol he better be right. Yeager and 'nem aren't too concerned with that because they're fighting zombies.
The mindset development you speak of is (for lack of a better term) a completely different school of thought. When LEOs can sit in a classroom for numerous hours a year and talk about the psychology of shooting and the physiology involved, the cultural stigmas, the related actions required they tend to drift toward "good citizen shoots bad guy in self defense scenario." Since all the actual shooting training of that is done on a golf course or in a shoot house - a controlled environment - it's done with rigid safety standards in place because the mindset has already been developed. You don't play with guns... you only use them as a last resort and only when the bad guy leaves you no option.
Yeager and 'nem are playing zombie hunter in a post-apocalyptic fantasy land where law and order has broken down. (Might be Baghdad, might be 20 seconds at an ATM) They're taken someone who's most likely had ZERO training on high-risk scenario management and in the course of a day or two, training them to be ninja warriors.
I agree it can be safely done without a cameraman downrange. But that takes a lot more time and involvement on the student's part and typically, students don't have the financial backer to make that happen. They get one fly-away training opportunity every couple of years. The taxpayers don't pay for them to sit in class for hours on end.
TR is training people to do that.
You may not agree with their methods but here's what many of you on this thread aren't considering - TR doesn't train, "how to avoid shooting yourself when removing your pistol from your holster when you poop." They're training how to fight with a firearm. That's a completely different set of goals and they've adjusted their curriculum accordingly.