OP states that there isn't a concern for concealment, but I am not sure that is necessarily true. I do not believe all Special Forces soldier are always in uniform. I think maybe they liked the idea of having one gun that can be used for duty and concealment. HK Mark 23 not so much.
OP states that there isn't a concern for concealment, but I am not sure that is necessarily true. I do not believe all Special Forces soldier are always in uniform. I think maybe they liked the idea of having one gun that can be used for duty and concealment. HK Mark 23 not so much.
How long have you guys been on INGO?
Clearly the special forces watch YouTube and saw James Yeager saying all guns should be Glock 19's
OP states that there isn't a concern for concealment, but I am not sure that is necessarily true. I do not believe all Special Forces soldier are always in uniform. I think maybe they liked the idea of having one gun that can be used for duty and concealment. HK Mark 23 not so much.
As everyone said, one pistol for everything. And the round capacity of the G19 is the same as the M9s. Also after owning both, in prefer the 19s grip angle/how it fits in your hand. More natural than the 17.
I don't own any Glocks, so that's why I'm asking, but aren't all Glock grip angles the same? Is the G19's grip angle more "1911ish" than the G17? That would interest me if so. (Especially now that some are US made.)
The angle is the same on the inside and front strap, but since the grip is shorter, the palm swell hits your hand in a different place. This changes the natural angle at which the gun points for any given person when compared to a G17.