blamecharles
Master
You forgot rocks, rope, and sticks!
Shhh i was starting slow. Can't ban all of them at once, that would make too many people mad.
You forgot rocks, rope, and sticks!
Didn't answer the poll because didn't see a proper response. The lady survived. If I had shot them, it wouldn't have been justified.
Shooting kids. Kiss your life goodbye (ever heard of a guy named Zimmerman?). I would have to be up against the wall and certain that I was going to die.
Question is would a reasonable person believe that deadly force is warranted. Going to be a hard arguement if 7 and 10 year olds are involved. For most of us on INGO I would say absolutetly No don't shoot or even show the gun.
I said no only because if it was just me I could easily have defended myself without lethal force. An old lady is different. And thats what those little creeps were countin on. They wouldnt choose a 200lb 6'2" guy to attack. They chose the easiest target available.
...You put three 16/17 year olds and depending on their build, it could be legit or bullshnikeys. ...
I think it's amazing that anyone is shocked to 'discover' that kid punks can be just as brutal and vicious as older punks.
“It’s amazing that these kids so young can be so violent,” Lt. O’Hanlon added.
Really? What world have you been living in??
As a means of last resort, if there was a gang of them, and I was protecting me and mine, you betcha. Not something I enjoy contemplating or would enjoy doing by any means.