JeepHammer
SHOOTER
Clouds tend to gather blot out the sun. Think about it.
And chicken little has been beating the "Cumin' Fer Yur GUNS" drum for 4 decades...
Clouds, even storms, don't mean the sky is falling.
Clouds tend to gather blot out the sun. Think about it.
1. According to the United States Code all adult men are part of the militia just as it was understood in 1787. Subsequent instances of addressing equality would expand this to all adult citizens.That doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
This has got to be close to the dumbest s*** I've ever readThat doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
I don't know why but that made me laugh out loud. Not at you though.This has got to be close to the dumbest s*** I've ever read
This has got to be close to the dumbest s*** I've ever read
That doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
And chicken little has been beating the "Cumin' Fer Yur GUNS" drum for 4 decades...
Clouds, even storms, don't mean the sky is falling.
Why are you even here? What brings you to a gun forum to essentially argue against gun ownership? It is sheer arrogance to think it won't happen just because it hasn't yet. Yes, we should all just sit back and expect them to not do exactly what they told us they would do, just like the rest of the Tories on here making excuses for the Regime.And chicken little has been beating the "Cumin' Fer Yur GUNS" drum for 4 decades...
Clouds, even storms, don't mean the sky is falling.
May your chains rest lightly upon you.That doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
That doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
Wat?That doesn't surprise me you can't understand you aren't part of "A Well Regulated Militia".
It also doesn't surprise me you don't understand "The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms" doesn't say a word about WHAT KIND of 'Arms'.
The wonderful thing about the Constitution is it CAN be changed, updated to deal with new threats.
There are two paths to these changes,
One through congress,
The second through "We The People", just in case confess comes off the rails...
Now, if you want to talk what's legal under the Constitution, then simply become a Supreme Court Justice, or a representitive qualified to argue at the Supreme Court.
When you are qualified, then you have standing to present a qualified opinion.
Until that point, I'll stick with the original Constitution, and the application of the Constitution through the Supreme Court,
Which has ruled time & time again the government has the right to restrict clear & present dangers to the American people.
(See NFA rulings which have been before the Supreme Court time & time again)
Now, if sociopaths hadn't abused full auto weapons, there wouldn't be any restrictions on them...
BUT, they did, and with great detremen to the general population of the US, see 1930s gangsters in particular.
Now that "Assault Weapons" are having horrendous effects on the general US population (see mass shootings) the subject *May* be revisited.
Notice the calm, rational, reasonable (layman) explanation and looking at events without a 'Right' or 'Left' slant on things...
No dug in dogma slant *I* "Think" should be the way it is, but the actual way it is, and what *Might* happen.
I'm living in the real world of mass shootings, 7 million millenialls that were eating tide pods 2 years ago now owning high capacity firearms, etc., Riots in the streets, white supremacists taking over the Capitol building...
Note I said I had LEGAL NFA devices/firearms.
That means the government is reasonably sure I'm stable enough to own such devices & firearms.
I'm 'Joe Average', I'm nothing special, and I don't play Constitutional Rights professional on the internet, or extremist of any kind...
I'm also not an idiot, I'm willing to jump through the government hoops, do what's legal, but more importantly, what's morally correct,
I'll listen to any debate "The Other Side" has and try to come to a morally correct decision.
(Not a sociopath, I don't 'Assume' I'm correct every second, and everyone else is an idiot or enemy)
So when you get that degree in Constitutional law, I'll give your *Opinion* some weight.
Until then I'll take the opinions and Supreme Court rulings as law and 'Correct' even if I don't entirely agree with them.
That's how a democratic republic is supposed to work... I don't have to be 'Happy' and have 'My Way' 100% of the time when the decisions make sense for the MAJORITY.
My firearms have murdered no one, but I don't own every firearm in the country...
Why are you even here? What brings you to a gun forum to essentially argue against gun ownership?
Let’s simplify your argument. How do you filter out evil? How do you filter out those that don’t follow either man’s law or God’s law that murder is bad/illegal? Take a swing at those and maybe you will find the answer to your own question.I'm not 'Exterme Enough' for several of these guys... I can live with that.
The question still remains, what about the root issues?
How do you filter out the mass shooters,
Or how do you stop the crap that prompts them to do the mass shootings prompting the proposed "Assault Weapons" bans?
Have you any ideas about that?
Spent even one minute on how to prevent mass shooter types from getting firearms in the first place?
The 70% or so of non-firearms owners in the U.S. are scared, and they are the majority of voters...
Have you spent even one minute trying to figure out how to reduce/eliminate the mass shootings so they ARE SAFE and don't demand more firearms laws/restrictions?
The way *THEY* see it, no firearms capable of mass shootings, no mass shootings.
What's your solution to the issue?
What is *Your* calm, rational, reasonable solution to the issue of mass shooters?
Give him time. He’ll top it.
The only solution would be locking people up before they've done anything wrong. Evil people exist and you simply cannot legislate away evil.I'm not 'Exterme Enough' for several of these guys... I can live with that.
The question still remains, what about the root issues?
How do you filter out the mass shooters,
Or how do you stop the crap that prompts them to do the mass shootings prompting the proposed "Assault Weapons" bans?
Have you any ideas about that?
Spent even one minute on how to prevent mass shooter types from getting firearms in the first place?
The 70% or so of non-firearms owners in the U.S. are scared, and they are the majority of voters...
Have you spent even one minute trying to figure out how to reduce/eliminate the mass shootings so they ARE SAFE and don't demand more firearms laws/restrictions?
The way *THEY* see it, no firearms capable of mass shootings, no mass shootings.
What's your solution to the issue?
What is *Your* calm, rational, reasonable solution to the issue of mass shooters?
The guns aren't going away, no matter how much you support it.