Maybe yes. Maybe no. Personally, I hope we don't find out.If the US suddenly cut off support for them, though, I doubt they'd retain it much longer. They would need a much more decisive victory first.
Maybe yes. Maybe no. Personally, I hope we don't find out.If the US suddenly cut off support for them, though, I doubt they'd retain it much longer. They would need a much more decisive victory first.
Highly unlikley. Looks like other grain dust explosions videos I've seen. Slower ignition vs. sudden explosion.Did the Russians do it?
Highly unlikley. Looks like other grain dust explosions videos I've seen. Slower ignition vs. sudden explosion.
Several injured as blast hits grain silos at Turkey’s Derince port
Governor says initial evaluations blame wheat dust compression for the explosion.www.aljazeera.com
I think that's Building 7.take a look at that second video. At the 3 second mark this is a large puff up high just behind that pillar, then it ignites.
I think that's Building 7.
I guess I’m not getting the reference.I think that's Building 7.
WTC Building 7.I guess I’m not getting the reference.
Still not following.WTC Building 7.
Okay. Think 911 conspiracy. Building 7. The truthers contend that it proves....nevermind.Still not following.
Ok I point out what looks like the ignition point and now I’m a conspiracy nut? What the ****?Okay. Think 911 conspiracy. Building 7. The truthers contend that it proves....nevermind.
Hey. I'm just saying what "building 7" means. Don't stone the messenger.Ok I point out what looks like the ignition point and now I’m a conspiracy nut? What the ****?
It wasn’t you. Just the usual suspect I guess trolling again.Hey. I'm just saying what "building 7" means. Don't stone the messenger.
I did not take it that way. I think he was just joking.It wasn’t you. Just the usual suspect I guess trolling again.
It's not that. 9/11 conspiracy theorists have a favorite hobby of looking closely at footage of the collapse of different WTC buildings and finding anything that looks like a squib or secondary explosion and claiming it as evidence that the whole thing was a controlled demolition with pre-placed charges. Your post just unintentionally reminded some of us of that, and we couldn't resist getting some amusement out of it. Nothing intended against you.Ok I point out what looks like the ignition point and now I’m a conspiracy nut? What the ****?