Regarding voting for Donald Trump rather than voting for Hillary Clinton

[jamil]

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I'm pretty sure the "real" Al Bundy would be a Trumper.

Buzz kill.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Laugh now...but it's a thing.

 

[Jludo]

It also means their choices are more honest. At least they don't pretend there is a choice. In America we have two parties to give us that illusion.

Isn't that the truth

 

[churchmouse]

Isn't that the truth

Yes it is.

 

[Dead Duck]

Oh well -

Heil Hillary

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Laugh now...but it's a thing.

...I want one.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

 

[jamil]

Buzz kill.

There may be more than two of us who vote for Al.

BTW, still can't rep you. I was gonna just for the new avatar.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

...I want one.

For my $500 and over contributors, I give them out for free.

 

[jbombelli]

We have several supreme court justices in their mid-late 70s. If Hillary wins, we will likely end up with younger, more activist liberal justices, and it's highly likely we'll never see a conservative or pro-2nd decision for the rest of our lives.

Think about that. It's this, and this reason alone, that I won't stand on libertarian principles for this election cycle. This time the stakes are just too high, and in times like this I will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

As much as I hate it, the alternative is too bad.

 

[Dead Duck]

We have several supreme court justices in their mid-late 70s. If Hillary wins, we will likely end up with younger, more activist liberal justices, and it's highly likely we'll never see a conservative or pro-2nd decision for the rest of our lives.

Think about that. It's this, and this reason alone, that I won't stand on libertarian principles for this election cycle. This time the stakes are just too high, and in times like this I will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

As much as I hate it, the alternative is too bad.

Plus - Do we really want a bleeder in control of our football?

 

[jamil]

We have several supreme court justices in their mid-late 70s. If Hillary wins, we will likely end up with younger, more activist liberal justices, and it's highly likely we'll never see a conservative or pro-2nd decision for the rest of our lives.

Think about that. It's this, and this reason alone, that I won't stand on libertarian principles for this election cycle. This time the stakes are just too high, and in times like this I will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

As much as I hate it, the alternative is too bad.

Well it's pretty much where I'm at. I just hope it won't be Trump nominating them if he wins.

 

[jbombelli]

Well it's pretty much where I'm at. I just hope it won't be Trump nominating them if he wins.

I'd rather him than Hillary. She's already put gun control out there as a key issue. She says SCOTUS got it wrong in Heller, and you can bet on anti-2a rulings if she gets to appoint justices. And they'll be younger. This election is more important to the 2nd than any other in recent history.

I hate it, but there it is. Trump may be a wildcard on this, but we know exactly where Hillary stands, no guessing at all. Sometimes reality sucks.

 

[Maximinus Thrax]

We have several supreme court justices in their mid-late 70s. If Hillary wins, we will likely end up with younger, more activist liberal justices, and it's highly likely we'll never see a conservative or pro-2nd decision for the rest of our lives.

Think about that. It's this, and this reason alone, that I won't stand on libertarian principles for this election cycle. This time the stakes are just too high, and in times like this I will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

As much as I hate it, the alternative is too bad.

This is the truth of the matter. I don't like Trump nor do I appreciate the blatant animosity he encourages amongst his supporters. Quite honestly, I'm sickened by the behavior I've seen from them.

However, now is not the time to play f*** f*** games. We face a very real assault on the 2A and the very framework of the US Constitution if the Dems are allowed to walk into the White House again. The SCOTUS is where they will win or lose their fight against the 2A and if they are allowed to stack the deck in their favor, kiss your Rights goodbye.
Trump is a wildcard and I still don't think we can actually count on his support on critical issues surrounding the 2A since he is so prone to changing his mind. That said, we KNOW what the Dems want to do and we KNOW what Billary will do when/if it is elected into office. On those grounds, I too will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

 

[jbombelli]

This is the truth of the matter. I don't like Trump nor do I appreciate the blatant animosity he encourages amongst his supporters. Quite honestly, I'm sickened by the behavior I've seen from them.

However, now is not the time to play f*** f*** games. We face a very real assault on the 2A and the very framework of the US Constitution if the Dems are allowed to walk into the White House again. The SCOTUS is where they will win or lose their fight against the 2A and if they are allowed to stack the deck in their favor, kiss your Rights goodbye.
Trump is a wildcard and I still don't think we can actually count on his support on critical issues surrounding the 2A since he is so prone to changing his mind. That said, we KNOW what the Dems want to do and we KNOW what Billary will do when/if it is elected into office. On those grounds, I too will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

It'll be my first time voting (R) since Reagan was in office.

 

[BugI02]

For my $500 and over contributors, I give them out for free.

Using Bernie's definition of 'free' I see

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Using Bernie's definition of 'free' I see

They are free! I'm just limiting then to a exclusive clientele.

What?

 

[MisterChester]

This is the truth of the matter. I don't like Trump nor do I appreciate the blatant animosity he encourages amongst his supporters. Quite honestly, I'm sickened by the behavior I've seen from them.

However, now is not the time to play f*** f*** games. We face a very real assault on the 2A and the very framework of the US Constitution if the Dems are allowed to walk into the White House again. The SCOTUS is where they will win or lose their fight against the 2A and if they are allowed to stack the deck in their favor, kiss your Rights goodbye.
Trump is a wildcard and I still don't think we can actually count on his support on critical issues surrounding the 2A since he is so prone to changing his mind. That said, we KNOW what the Dems want to do and we KNOW what Billary will do when/if it is elected into office. On those grounds, I too will be pragmatic, hold my nose, and vote for the (R).

I was listening to NPR today and they had some republican strategist from Florida and he claimed that he and a bunch of other republicans would be more OK with 4 years of Hillary than to deal with Trump.

They don't know the stakes.

 

[jbombelli]

I was listening to NPR today and they had some republican strategist from Florida and he claimed that he and a bunch of other republicans would be more OK with 4 years of Hillary than to deal with Trump.

They don't know the stakes.

No, they DO know the stakes. Their gravy train is in jeopardy, and they know it. They will fight to keep it no matter the cost to the rest of us, because they don't really, actually, care about the country as much as they do themselves.

They'd keep it with Hillary.