Why would any thinking person listen to a thing Dan Rather has to say?
People listen to Trump, so I have the same complaint.
Why would any thinking person listen to a thing Dan Rather has to say?
Why would any thinking person listen to a thing Dan Rather has to say?
Intellectually dishonest post is intellectually dishonest. David Hogg holds a position you, and many others do not like. What does his sexuality have to do with it? I'll tell you, absolutely nothing. Predicting that he will "come out" in the future, is obviously a slight on his masculinity, despite there being zero evidence that he is actually inclined to be that way. So your implication is clearly a negative portrayal. You know it, I know it, everyone with half a brain knows it. Those that deny it, are only doing so, because it's me bringing up the point.
Hate isn't in my wheelhouse, and your "truth," is not mine. This isn't the truthful political funny pictures thread. If you're going to start talking about the veracity of the memes/cartoons, then you a LOT of backtracking to do.
In the same thread even. You was just throwing a fit about David Hogg’s picture.
Hate isn't in my wheelhouse, and your "truth," is not mine. This isn't the truthful political funny pictures thread. If you're going to start talking about the veracity of the memes/cartoons, then you a LOT of backtracking to do.
People listen to Trump, so I have the same complaint.
Yep, same with the fit over the "historical accuracy" of the kapernick ww2 picture...
We all know this isn't the truthful political funny pictures thread after all.
Oh noes!!!.... someone I don't respond to put me on the ignore list. That'll show me.
The thing that makes memes funny is the underlying truths deep down. Both sides can throw out some dubious "truths", but if they believe it, they'll find it funny.
So look for the truth in the meme you posted of Obama windsaling or whatever with Trump in the baby seat. What deep truth underlies that?
Why would any thinking person listen to a thing Dan Rather has to say?
It is interesting that you a mighty demig-d would deign entangle your self in the affairs of a base mortal man who has attained to the lowly position of president and is a mere billionaire.
When you have done so much more.
I just think it's funny that ad hominems are bad, but quoting someone doing just that is fine I guessWhy would any thinking person listen to a thing Dan Rather has to say?