Basically she said we can't create a perimeter with a radius of 600 yards with seven agents.
What timeline am I even living in right now?
Holy clap!
I think if you can get on the sloped roof you are safe from law enforcement, or at least the USSS.*Do you know if the site is open to the general public now?
They're still trying to figure out how to connect the whole thing to Iran. Give them time.I think that maybe the most intelligent thing I've ever heard her say
Somebody went back in time and stepped on a bug.What timeline am I even living in right now?
It's a trap. They will use this as a reason to ban AR15's.Basically she said we can't create a perimeter with a radius of 600 yards with seven agents.
I may have felt the Earth to jerk to a stop!
Holy s***, I cannot believe those cogent and reasonably accurate and intelligent words came out of her mouth. I know we all like to make fun of her, but I've seen many unscripted moments where she came across as, let's just say less than high IQ.
She sounds like someone who actually was sat down with drawings or images of the event, actual knowledge of firearms, and had reality explained to her in a manner she could understand. That she would then go forth and speak as she did, considering her past positions, I find to be truly amazing.
100%...It's a trap. They will use this as a reason to ban AR15's.
If you go back in James O'Keefe investigations, the one where he's undercover as a gay guy, the investigated person clearly states he writes scripts for hearings such as these. He called them posture hearings.Somebody in big tech bought that seat for her from Tammany. That somebody must be taking an interest in this and gave her a script to read and questions to ask. Her understanding what she is saying is irrelevant to the person paying the bill, they just want it said.
What if they traced it and found out it was owned by Nancy Pelosi?Anytime there is a "gun trace" I am always somewhat nonplussed.
Who cares where the gun came from? I view gun Trace activity as primarily supporting add-on charges. The individual in possession of the gun may not possess a gun. Alternatively, it may include an effort to go after a non dealer.
None of the gun Trace outputs however, matter to the immediate violent crime which has occurred when the unlawful use of a firearm is involved. What matters is the human being who pulled the trigger, and if there are any others which remain associated with that individual who are still a danger to society. I cannot imagine a scenario where a gun Trace addresses any of the most immediately critical questions. More importantly if the individual who committed the crime is dead, the gun Trace answers no questions which matter.
While gun Traces may be a relatively standard investigative practice. As a citizen respecting the Constitution, and believing fully in the restrictive and declaratory clauses of the Bill of Rights I see little to no value to them relative to the danger the infrastructure required to execute them create. They are however every totalitarians dream, since they're 100% effective use requires registration of arms and control of movement.
Better to require the visible destruction of the infrastructure the ATF, FBI and others have created, and to prohibit any aggregation of the firearms purchase data from any source, than compromise the Constitution. Personally I would prefer to see the NFA GCA and Hughes amendment placed in the dustbin of History first by SCOTUS and second by the legislative Branch. Better yet take us back to 1900 with no requirement to serialize firearms from the government. Frankly it's none of their business.
Was he a right winger? He registered as a Republican, something many leftists did in an attempt to swing the primary away from Trump.When a shooting is done by a right winger we know within 45 minutes.
I was previously not aware of Rep Mace.If you want fun, look up Nancy Mace's time grilling USSS director today. Wow! She wasnt having any.
Words that should not be aired got aired on live radio today.