I wonder if the fedbois that ran up there knew where the ladder was?
It’s also a gun forum. If a little blood or gore (i.e. reality) upsets people, maybe they should take up basket weaving and join that site!@printcraft, you know better.
Folks, this is a family friendly site. If you have to ask if its ok and add the disclaimer "delete if necessary", its probably over the line.
Send a mod a link to the pic if you arent sure. We'll give a thumbs up/down.
We still won't know.Everything is speculation, and theory at this point.
Anything can be possible. But we won't know what until the investigation is completed.
As far as I'm concerned, the Secret Service just "lost one" yesterday. The f*cktard just missed. Just like with Reagan.As Trump was being egressed from the location, loaded into his Chevy, did anyone notice three moderately incompetent looking chicks standing next to the vehicle?
And, since I'm already being mean, one of them not even being able to holster her pistol?
Can we at least give the man the "B" team rather than the "C" team SS detail?
That's been some of the criticism I've seen... How come all the adjacent rooftops weren't secured? Especially the one that had the best closest spot for an attempted assassination.I didn’t go thru all 27 pages , but my question is HOW did the shooter get on that roof top in the first place ?
I mean I know how he got on there , but how did the security detail not have that covered as a possible issue !?
Or ever have their own sniper posted there as coverage !
Even seen some interviews of people saying they told police there was someone on that roof before it ever happened ! I mean seriously, they should of been all over that & stopped it before it happened ‘That's been some of the criticism I've seen... How come all the adjacent rooftops weren't secured?
We can disagree. I've been on enough scenes of fatal accidents, assaults and homicides to see a wide variety of things. I'm not in any way claiming the photo in question is valid or is a photo of who it claims to be, I'm simply stating that there is a limited amount in data available from a photograph and there are explanations for seeing both wet and dried blood visible whether the guy had been laying there five minutes or an hour. Blood pools and after leaving the body blood dries. Many times, when a recently killed body which has been resting motionless is disturbed the blood which had pooled internally will then find it's way out and you have both visible.A seemingly valid, but totally irrelevant question. The gentleman in the photo has long-dried blood on his face. My EDUCATED guess is several hours. He also has fresh, wet blood on his t-shirt, within inches of fairly dry blood on his neck. There is a combination of fresh, wet blood and dried blood on the ground in front of him. If the prevailing weather conditions were sufficient to completely dry the blood on his face, in his nose/mouth, and SOME of it on the ground, why did those exact same conditions NOT dry the rest of the blood on the ground, and the blood on his t-shirt? Keep in mind that this photo(?) was taken within minutes of the gentleman's passing. I don't buy it. If you do, please offer an explanation for what is actually in the photo.
It's worth the watch just for Kate Mara.Mr. Rate: Would've been a bad job to take, though.
Nick Memphis: How come?
Mr. Rate: Whoever took that shot's probably dead now. That's how conspiracy works. Them boys on the grassy knoll, they were dead within three hours. Buried in the damn desert. Unmarked graves out past Terlingua.
Nick Memphis: And you know this for a fact?
Mr. Rate: Still got the shovel!
As far as I'm concerned, the Secret Service just "lost one" yesterday. The f*cktard just missed. Just like with Reagan.
The only consolation is the perp is dead, so we don't have to be treated to the spectacle of a judge releasing him to go back to living with his mother.
The would-be Trump's assassin was on a roof outside the secured perimeter where anyone could go in and out.That's been some of the criticism I've seen... How come all the adjacent rooftops weren't secured? Especially this one?
*murderer.
Some people just need to stop.A seemingly valid, but totally irrelevant question. The gentleman in the photo has long-dried blood on his face. My EDUCATED guess is several hours. He also has fresh, wet blood on his t-shirt, within inches of fairly dry blood on his neck. There is a combination of fresh, wet blood and dried blood on the ground in front of him. If the prevailing weather conditions were sufficient to completely dry the blood on his face, in his nose/mouth, and SOME of it on the ground, why did those exact same conditions NOT dry the rest of the blood on the ground, and the blood on his t-shirt? Keep in mind that this photo(?) was taken within minutes of the gentleman's passing. I don't buy it. If you do, please offer an explanation for what is actually in the photo.
From what we know 5 people have been shot.Any news on anyone who may have been shot?