Forget a judge, where are the locals with a bucket of tar and a bag full of feathers to haul this twit to the nearest train depot and run her out of town?
This right here. If you remember they were bringing up this "public healthy emergency" idea in Indianapolis earlier this year. In fact it seemed the media hacks were pushing it on their own, and kept asking if the public health department was going to do anything about it.This is a test and only a test. Dems have to try this out at a state level before going national.
Ok, so maybe she isn't sooooo bad...Wow.. She is a real work of art... What a total scumbag she is..
Sexual battery settlement
In December 2019, a former campaign staffer and spokesperson, James Hallinan, accused Lujan Grisham of sexual battery. According to Hallinan, the incident took place during a staff meeting in 2018. By his account, Lujan Grisham poured a bottle of water on his crotch and then slapped and grabbed his crotch through his pants while laughing. He said the incident happened "in front of everybody".[61]
Agreed, They should live within the confines that they push on us.How about she gets no police protection, no guards at the buildings, and no private security for her.
Primary brownie points and averts the blame to others.I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this governor's logic. This governor knows that it is unconstitutional, and expects it to be challenged, already getting pushback..... And does it anyway?
The dissenting opinion focused much more on public health. There were citations to all sorts of studies, both in the public health scholarship and in other social sciences, saying that we can't even have this discussion without talking about the public health impact of guns and gun violence, that that's a key piece of this, and that the majority opinion just disregarded it.
Justice Alito, in his concurring opinion, was very dismissive of public health evidence. He said, basically, “Well, if New York's law is so great, why did the Buffalo shooting happen?” In the concurring opinions, there was a lot of disregard for public health evidence. But the dissent was very focused on public health evidence
It used to be that people who were being considered for the Supreme Court said that they should be restrained in striking down state laws that were passed democratically in order to accomplish important goals. But this seems like an aggressive way of striking down democratically passed laws.
Justice Thomas in the majority opinion even alludes to that. He says, “Yes, there are times that the court should defer to legislatures, but when we're talking about an individual right as important as the Second Amendment, we can't do that. We have to look to history and tradition and not defer to the legislature.”