So he killed a US Marshall, and they paid him out a settlement. How is that a "Nope"?
You obviously fail to remember the question that "nope" was in response to.
So he killed a US Marshall, and they paid him out a settlement. How is that a "Nope"?
Because of the type of people they were...you do realize that according to DHS, I am a terrorist in spite of my criminal activities being limited to traffic violations? So, should I consider it a reasonable expectation to suppose that Lon and I may find ourselves trading lead some day? If so, should I consider it right and proper because I am not a good little sheep and ingest their narrative? After all, when any ONE of being a veteran (which I am not), supporting adherence to the Constitution, supporting the Second Amendment, opposing illegal immigration, opposing abortion, or believing in the Second Coming of Christ (all the remainder of which apply) makes you a terrorist per DHS official documents.
The idea of summary execution for holding politically incorrect beliefs doesn't disturb you, especially given that what constitutes politically incorrect can be, well, fluid?
You obviously fail to remember the question that "nope" was in response to.
They paid him so they didn't have to admit liability.
I remember what I asked quite clearly.
that an innocent man (Kevin Harris) was shot the day following a lawful self defense action, as determined by an Idaho jury.
Not sure if srs or don't know the Ruby Ridge Story. Harris was not protecting self when he shot the agent. He was protecting the Jr. Weaver, after Jr. Weaver engaged the agent that shot Jr Weaver's dog.
NY TIMES said:Essentially, the jury found that Mr. Harris and Mr. Weaver acted in self-defense in the shooting death of Deputy Federal Marshal William Degan on Aug. 21.
Not sure if srs or don't know the Ruby Ridge Story. Harris was not protecting self when he shot the agent. He was protecting the Jr. Weaver, after Jr. Weaver engaged the agent that shot Jr Weaver's dog.
Where is this explicitly stated? I've seen reference to those DHS documents on several occasions. I have never viewed it in the way you, and many others have. Truth be told, I think coming to such a conclusion is disingenuous and indicative of paranoia, if one actually believes it.
Not sure if srs or don't know the Ruby Ridge Story. Harris was not protecting self when he shot the agent. He was protecting the Jr. Weaver, after Jr. Weaver engaged the agent that shot Jr Weaver's dog.
Unfortunately for you my "spin," as you call is GTG.... evidenced by fact that none of the agents involved received any jail time. And yes, the rules of engagement were ridiculous, however, the fact that the person LH was shooting at was armed, which has been cited countless times since the incident probably, just maybe, played a hand in him staying out of prison. Not disingenuous, just the way it is. Write a missive to Capitol Hill and complain to them....not me.
Not sure if srs or don't know the Ruby Ridge Story. Harris was not protecting self when he shot the agent. He was protecting the Jr. Weaver, after Jr. Weaver engaged the agent that shot Jr Weaver's dog.
Oh snap.there's a raid going on right now
I heard that too. The woman seems pretty adamant about not being taken into custody too. Not sure what's happening with the Reverend.The feds just yelled "Be a man" at them via bullhorn. Are they trying to escalate this?
They said there are four people there. Sounds like one woman and three men.
They go to jail, it gets written off as a failed cause. They die they become martyrs.It's trending on my feed right now.
Only four left? Only need one missile!