Federal UBC? No. That's not an enumerated power delegated by the people and the states to the feds. No more unconstitutional laws to restore unconstitutional infringements.
We're buying as fast as we can!
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...1-black-friday-2015-sets-new-nics-record.html
Actually, that one appears to be your basic nut job. Note that he didn't hurt a single person in PP, but attacked out of it.
How hard is it to get a conceal carry in California? New York hard?
Hypothetical:
Would you trade submitting to universal background checks for nationwide constitutional carry?
Obama: US safe against ISIS attack - CNNPolitics.com
obama: U.S. safe from ISIS attack.......... has this delusional dip**** ever been right?
Probably alien meteor mind control.
Can someone please inform me what the difference is between a universal background check and the the one the run on you when you buy a new handgun?
From what I understand, it depends on the county. A friend of mine near LA says you have to be a celebrity (and my friend is wealthy, but not famous).
Total internet rumor is that this county where the shooting occurred is "shall issue". But I'd be surprised if the building wasn't a gun-free zone. And even then, the pistols many of us carry would be illegal in the state of California.
No law can stop someone from legally buying guns and delivering them to criminals, so even if private sales were illegal it would still happen because guess what? PEOPLE BREAK LAWS.
How is that so hard to understand?
I tend to agree on a philosophical level. I haven't talked myself into agreeing on a practical level yet.
The best bet for govt, if they were to take action incrementally, would be to require the registration of all new firearm sales, and forbid transfers to private parties, of those weapons, unless registered too. All firearms existing prior to passage are exempt.
Law enforcement now says it appears he was radicalized.
I love that all of this is coming out just moments after the President's speech.
I would fire my intelligence briefers at some point...Obama hadn't heard it on the news yet so he didn't know
CNN said:It appears that Farook was radicalized, which contributed to his motive, though other things — like workplace grievances — may have also played a role, other law enforcement sources said.
Nwadike said he did not see any sign that Farook was upset, and did not see him argue with anyone.
"I have not at any time noticed any sign that he would do anything like that," he said. "I can't understand why."
Another co-worker, Patrick Baccari, said he also was sitting at the same table as Farook, who suddenly disappeared, leaving his coat on his chair. Baccari said when the shooting started, he sought refuge in a bathroom and suffered minor wounds from shrapnel slicing through the wall.
Baccari described Farook as reserved and said he showed no signs of unusual behavior. Earlier this year he traveled to Saudi Arabia and returned with a wife, later growing a beard, Baccari said.
That background checks are constitutional?
Crap. I need to put INGO away while working. I just glazed over your post and thought you were talking about the constitutionality of forcing reciprocity which you did not even mention.
NBC NEWS EXCLUSIVE: Attackers left behind a remote control bomb similar to Boston Bombing bombs at scene