Nope, not even close.Did they though?
Nope, not even close.Did they though?
No way in hell that almost 2/3 of Californians voted to keep him.Nope, not even close.
No way in hell that almost 2/3 of Californians voted to keep him.
Our elections are as credible as Zimbabwe's at this point.
22,000,000 registered voters. 24,800,000 eligible voters.No way in hell that almost 2/3 of Californians voted to keep him.
Our elections are as credible as Zimbabwe's at this point.
Really?
Why is that not easily believable?
They elected Jerry Brown as governor... TWICE.
As an Californian in exile believe me when I tell you that there are more than enough people who take their latte with kool-aid to keep him in office. It’s the main reason why I am now a happy member of your wonderful state.No way in hell that almost 2/3 of Californians voted to keep him.
Our elections are as credible as Zimbabwe's at this point.
Incentives are to be saved and used for the ones that are most likely to vote left. You can’t really consider letting everyone get a check just because they get a jab…I think the biggest problem with this mandate is the finger wagging “you will comply” aspect. If the goal is compliance, why not use incentives? Maybe another round of stimulus checks for only the vaccinated? Or maybe take away access to federal benefits, loans, subsidies, etc.? This whole thing screams of authoritarianism more than a sincere hope for compliance.
I’m not suggesting we do those things...Incentives are to be saved and used for the ones that are most likely to vote left. You can’t really consider letting everyone get a check just because they get a jab…
I agree that the use of the word "jab" is propaganda....but who is using the "jab" language? Those who think the vaccine is non-threatening?Can we dispense with this “jab” nonsense. It’s pure propaganda and sounds dumb. It’s an injection, a shot, maybe even a vaccine. It’s not a “jab”
there is power in language. A jab is non threatening, a vaccine is potentially dangerous.
I’d sure like to know then etymology of that word. But I think it started in liberal circles and then moved towards those who are anti vax using it as a slur.I agree that the use of the word "jab" is propaganda....but who is using the "jab" language? Those who think the vaccine is non-threatening?
Please do the math for me so I can get 66%. I am having trouble connecting the dots. I am sure it is me because Bug says I have trouble in this area!22,000,000 registered voters. 24,800,000 eligible voters.
9,200,000 voted in recall election.
I believe it's British in originI’d sure like to know then etymology of that word. But I think it started in liberal circles and then moved towards those who are anti vax using it as a slur.
regardless it’s a brand new phrase trying to dilute what is actually being done.
Seriously? In California? Where Democrats outnumber Republicans nearly 2 to 1?
(Note the percentages)
View attachment 158630
View attachment 158631
And they're talking about landlords kicking people out of their home.Less than 24 hours for Newsom to take bars away from all the naughty little boys and girls. Californians are about to get absolutely raped by Newsom after his "victory".
What happened to "The CDC must stop landlords from evicting deadbeats because being on the streets will give you covid and kill you"?And they're talking about landlords kicking people out of their home.