If the true concern behind the Vaccine Mandate is the health of the nation why are cigarettes still legal?
Follow the science or follow the money?
Well, the mandate is not and never has been about public health, so...
If the true concern behind the Vaccine Mandate is the health of the nation why are cigarettes still legal?
Follow the science or follow the money?
Who is under threat of becoming unemployable by rule if they don’t get a polio or tetanus vaccine?Does that include polio and tetanus?
Who is under threat of becoming unemployable by rule if they don’t get a polio or tetanus vaccine?
There’s a legitimate pushback for the sentiments about not really being free if you do something you oppose for the same of freedom. Like how consistent are you? It’s a harder case to make if we look at the extreme. Let’s say that the disease kills 100%. It’s very contagious. A vaccine comes along that is proven 100% effective and is proven 99.99% safe. Does the same meme apply then?No one, it's a completely bogus argument.
Cars?
I watched a bit of the questioning about the mandate, specifically about natural immunity, in congress. As whatsherface talked about all the studies they reviewed, I wondered when they started their review? Has it been ongoing? Wa it before Biden issued the EO or after? Was it done to justify the order, or was the order driven by the data?Well, the mandate is not and never has been about public health, so...
That just exemplifies the consistency. Cigarettes? No, people are free to smoke, but less so where it affects others. Cars? No, people are free ti drive cars, albeit with rules that at least ostensibly curtail deaths and injuries. Guns? Well. They can take lives and they can save lives.Cars?
Cigarettes?
Guns?
Inquiring minds want to know…
Judging by her eyes, I'm thinking that one had issues long before Covid and the vaccine were even in the picture.It is now apparent the vaccine can affect one's mental health.
This should mean the end of vaccine EUA and mandates then, right?
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
So do we need to ratio 89% effective by the realized\touted effectiveness of their vaccine?
Does an EUA for an oral covid treatment invalidate the EUA for vaccines? Or can they both exist simultaneously?I would imagine that people in general find pills to be more palatable than shots, even though it's for the same thing. It's also possible that the margins in pills are greater than they are in shots, in which case, ...
Always follow the money
In 6 months?Cars?
Cigarettes?
Guns?
Inquiring minds want to know…
Just asking the logical question.Who is under threat of becoming unemployable by rule if they don’t get a polio or tetanus vaccine?
Just asking the logical question.
if those are cool, then it sounds like the objection isn't to the vaccine, just to be being told you should (or must ) get it. Which backs up my assertion that people would stop wearing pants if the government told you to do it.
FTR, I totally against these mandates - I think they're unnecessary, introsive, and divisive. In the end they will do more harm than good.
But if .gov says to do something, that doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, or if I do it, that doesn't mean I'm submitting.
I understand where you’re going with it. It’s a poor way to make the case. You still haven’t hit on the reason people are against it. It’s not JUST because the government said so. Look at my other post on the subject. Maybe it would help.Just asking the logical question.
if those are cool, then it sounds like the objection isn't to the vaccine, just to be being told you should (or must ) get it. Which backs up my assertion that people would stop wearing pants if the government told you to do it.
FTR, I totally against these mandates - I think they're unnecessary, introsive, and divisive. In the end they will do more harm than good.
But if .gov says to do something, that doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, or if I do it, that doesn't mean I'm submitting.