How so? The text of 26 USC 5845 hasn't been amended.
Exactly.
No one will be prosecuted for possessing bumpstocks prior to the publication of the final rule.
Well, ok. If someone is prosecuted for that, it would violate ex post facto.
How so? The text of 26 USC 5845 hasn't been amended.
Not disgusting. Accurate around here.What the holy hell is the point of this??? What’s more important to you, seeing our rights get trampled or taking pleasure in who might or might not have been the one doing the trampling?
Grow up.
Disgusting...
Not disgusting. Accurate around here.
Teflon Don is avoiding responsibility for this anti-2A power grab.
Good to see the resident fallacious pot stirrers are still here.
good to see people still fall for their crap
lolz
I don't understand why folks even respond to some of them.
As being born and raised in MD and a lifetime NRA member since I was a young kid I can see people's distaste towards the NRA very easily. It's not been often that the NRA's legislative folks have ever bothered to show up across one of the rivers from their new building to give pro gun Maryland members and residents a helping hand with the draconian laws that have been passed. One would think they would be much more proactive since they have been involved in certain legislation since 1975.
For years now I look at being an NRA member in a different way, I look at the programs that they have been doing a long long time and are very good at. The kids programs, the education programs, local shooting matches, state and national shoots, the magazines and scores of other great things they do.
I gifted my son with a lifetime membership when he was young and I get two magazines for our memberships, I read them and then forward them to where my son is stationed.
By the time they make there way through the barracks they are worn out he tells me.
Yep, it sucks that the NRA has made what most of us think are huge mistakes.
I just focus on what they are good at. I still with send them a few bucks every year.
Lot of panties in a wad over something that not going to happen.
I hope you are right. What makes you say so?
Lot of panties in a wad over something that not going to happen.
I hope you are right. What makes you say so?
It won't hold up in court. A bump stock doesn't fit the legislative definition of a machine gun. I think Trump knows this and it might be part of his chess game. It may look like he supports this but, it not legal to ban them.
So more 4D chess?
It really burns my biscuits when Trump does stuff like this. There was zero reason to push for a bumpstock ban. Vegas has faded from memory, all this does is signal to his base that he is squishy...
And the worst part is that the precedent this sets is a huge slippery slope that will be used to take all semi autos in the future.
You are aware that Trump supported the so called "assault weapons ban", aren't you?
Trump is like any other piece of **** executive....at the end of the day, just another piece of ****.