Yes. Though I wasn't commenting on the other stuff, just the verbiage about the bump stock possession.
Point taken; but, I think since this guy has the other, more serious issues, the bump stock issue won't make it to the appellate process.
Yes. Though I wasn't commenting on the other stuff, just the verbiage about the bump stock possession.
I think for the left side of the bench, it's the outcome they want. That's how they think about cases. I think Roberts, and Kavanaugh would most likely side with the lefties on this, maybe for different reasons though. Out of Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas, I think at least two of them would dissent.
I'm pretty sure Gorsuch would jump all over that. He doesn't like when the bureaucracy makes or changes rules.As Thomas has (I think fairly) bemoaned, the court has generally tended to not address 2A issues and treat it like a 2nd class right. If it does go to court, I'd imagine the case will center around whether Trump's administration had the authority to do what they did in establishing that ban and not if it violates the 2A. I'm not sure this wouldn't be the surest way of overturning it, especially amongst the lefties.
As Thomas has (I think fairly) bemoaned, the court has generally tended to not address 2A issues and treat it like a 2nd class right. If it does go to court, I'd imagine the case will center around whether Trump's administration had the authority to do what they did in establishing that ban and not if it violates the 2A. I'm not sure this wouldn't be the surest way of overturning it, especially amongst the lefties.
His being the first prosecution is quote intentional, as proof of how "effective" the ban is...One thing I’ll say about this case, the dude is a poster boy for how ridiculous bans are. This guy sounds like a real nutter. This ban is for people who obey the law. It’s not gonna stop people who might use these things to harm people. The people using these things for recreation—their intended purpose—are the only people this law applies to, of course along with the manufacturers. The people who would do harm don’t care to follow it.
I bought an M&P 15-22 a couple of years ago hoping to bumpstock it to make wasting ammo easier so I'm still hoping to one day make that happen.
I wonder how well it would work with a 15-22 since it relies on recoil to make it work? I don't know if .22 lr would generate enough energy.
You have to change a few things in the base rifle and there's definitely a technique to it but hitchcock45 (?) was playing with one in one of his videos and it seemed to work quite well.
Can't find Hitchcock's video but here's another one: [video=youtube;H1DlWCNZVs8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1DlWCNZVs8[/video]
You have to change a few things in the base rifle and there's definitely a technique to it but hitchcock45 (?) was playing with one in one of his videos and it seemed to work quite well.
Can't find Hitchcock's video but here's another one: [video=youtube;H1DlWCNZVs8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1DlWCNZVs8[/video]
How about a binary trigger?
If you don't tighten down the little allen screws right when you install the drop-in trigger, you can get a binary trigger inadvertently. Ask me how I know...
How about a binary trigger?
Echo Trigger is better since if you are able to pull faster than the bolt can go, you can still fire, but with the Binary Trigger, if you go faster than the bolt, you have to eject the cartridge before you can fire again.
The Echo trigger IS a binary trigger