A semi-auto will function without a bumpstock. A machine gun magazine isn’t a machine gun.Many semi-autos won't feed and function without magazines, hence they fall under "arms."
A semi-auto will function without a bumpstock. A machine gun magazine isn’t a machine gun.Many semi-autos won't feed and function without magazines, hence they fall under "arms."
Many semi-autos won't feed and function without magazines, hence they fall under "arms."
A semi-auto will function without a bumpstock. A machine gun magazine isn’t a machine gun.
If magazines are accessories and so are pistol grips, then every single last regulation and rule banning scary black rifles are perfectly constitutional and we have nothing to complain about; same thing with high powered “sniper scopes”(yes that’s a thing that’s getting targeted) thermals, red dots etc.As dumb as I think bumpstocks are, how exactly is a bumpstock a firearm? It is an accessory. Magazines are accessories. Pistol grips are accessories.
My only point was that magazines aren't "accessories" they are integral to the ability of most semi autos to function. The judge in the CA mag limit case ruled they fall under the umbrella of "arms", similar to ammo.
The comment was in no way a reference to bump stocks, which I agree aren't machine guns, nor should MG mags be considered machine guns.
I just came for the Trump Bashing.
INGO does not disappoint...... or do they...
C'mon dude. You don't think Trump has earned a bit of your ire for doing this? You know, you can say "Yay, I love that Trump did xyz!" while also saying, "Boo, I hate that Trump did abc!"
Bingo!! People need to stop being conditioned little *****es. The 2nd amendment applies to ANYTHING you use to defend yourself.If you’re going by the “common use” doctrine, the ATFs guess of 520,000 bumpstocks being in the wild should pass muster on that one (however; every gun site I have been on has numerous examples of people’s homebuilt versions on it, and most of the sites had 3d printed ones being cranked out like crazy after vegas, so that number is very low IMHO)
We ALL know the downfalls of automatic fire, however stating that bumpfire stocks are “just accessories” and not covered by 2A is exactly where an anti-gunner would want us to go, admit it has no protection if it is an accessory, the ATF didn’t think so and classified it as a firearm, we just had a CA judge classify magazines as ARMS themselves, quit playing their game. 2A applies to any blade, bludgeon, spike, projectile, self defense item, etc.
I'm a gun guy. When I vote, it's all about voting for my guns rights. Trump was the best person for my guns in 2016.
This bumpstock thing sucks, regardless, I will also vote for Trump in 2020...... do you know of a better person running to protect my guns?
Is Sarah Palin running? Then Trump it is.
I'll probably have to vote for Trump in 2020 too. Doesn't mean I can't point out where he's ****ed up.
And Sarah Palin is the AOC of the right. It's not that she's stupid. It's that she doesn't know a whole lot about anything, except figuring out what language to use to get a following on her side. I'd rather have a president that knows a lot about a lot, but short of that, if the two choices were Palin vs AOC for potus, I'd have to go for the right wingnut over the left wingnut.
Yeah. With Palin is it side-signaling or is it a deeply thought out position? At least with Shapiro he gives a reasoning which makes it obvious that he holds a position after considerable depth of thought. With Palin it’s hard to say whether she’s reasoned something out or she holds the position because people on the right are supposed to hold that position.Palin did "misgender" Manning on Twitter this morning, so that gives her a few points. She knows how to poke the outrage bear.
Shapiro did on Rogan yesterday, as well.
I'll probably have to vote for Trump in 2020 too. Doesn't mean I can't point out where he's ****ed up.
And Sarah Palin is the AOC of the right. It's not that she's stupid. It's that she doesn't know a whole lot about anything, except figuring out what language to use to get a following on her side. I'd rather have a president that knows a lot about a lot, but short of that, if the two choices were Palin vs AOC for potus, I'd have to go for the right wingnut over the left wingnut.
Like saying his father was born in Germany? I can't even imagine why he thought he needed to lie about that.
Like saying his father was born in Germany? I can't even imagine why he thought he needed to lie about that.
Like saying his father was born in Germany? I can't even imagine why he thought he needed to lie about that.
I really don't care about that. If he has some pathology for lying about his status, I really don't care a whole lot about that. What I care about is his fidelity to the law, which he doesn't have a great track record on. And I could say neither do so many other presidents, but few have been as audacious.
"Mental illness"Some people you understand why they lie. It's the ones that lie for no reason that's baffling.... at least to me.