That looks like a photomicrograph of a cell being attacked by WuVid
If they're anything like the hairy donut meme that is circulating on the face of books right now. . . . I'll pass.We have donuts............
Why have I never seen this?!?! Those darn Canadians.
Great now I gotta google thisIf they're anything like the hairy donut meme that is circulating on the face of books right now. . . . I'll pass.
If they're anything like the hairy donut meme that is circulating on the face of books right now. . . . I'll pass.
Why are people here reticent to name names, or is the assumption they have some sorta anti-2A agenda?
Who has one and what is it, backed not by opinion but quoted posts? There is a lot of collective "knowledge" about certain members, you know who you are, here but too often its thin on facts.
I'll give an example.
If you don't vote for a Republican, its a vote for a the Democrat.
Democrats are for gun control.
Therefore a vote for a democrat is a vote for gun control.
But that doesn't make any sense with the other one I see
If you vote for a third party, its a vote for a Democrat
Democrats are for gun control.
Therefore a vote for a third party is a vote for gun control
However, those that voted third party, if they don't raise any waves and go with the flow.....
don't receive any consqeuences.
Since some members have made their votes known that they voted 3rd party or democrat in the last election, i should put a reply to some posts saying some here voted for it.
But that would be trollish behavior.
I would agree.
trollish behavior doesn't seem to be equally applied to all members.
Long paragraph, or a slew of mordant one-liners ... it all becomes tedious.screed
/skrēd/
noun: screed; plural noun: screeds
1.
a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious.
te·di·ous
/ˈtēdēəs/
adjective: tedious
too long, slow, or dull; tiresome or monotonous.
The constitution doesn't overtly criticize one-linersLong paragraph, or a slew or mordant one-liners ... it all becomes tedious.