I doubt they offered anything. More likely, they have dirt on him.Makes you wonder what they offered for his vote. Follow the money uh power uh
Well you get it right.
I doubt they offered anything. More likely, they have dirt on him.Makes you wonder what they offered for his vote. Follow the money uh power uh
Well you get it right.
To be fair, this is the very model envisioned by the founders: each state its own N=1 experiment in democracy.
Now that IS suspicious... Plus they only paid for one year registration because, you know, after the November midterm heist, I mean 'election', this website will no doubt vaporize, having served it's purpose of deceiving the masses.
just a weird coincidence.
In California, of course, a state where you can be absolutely sure abortion will not be inconvenienced in even the slightest way.T
That would be 4 May 2022
LA abortion protest turns violent: Protesters lob 'rocks and bottles' at cops, smash cruiser's window
Violence broke out in Los Angeles as protesters railed against a leaked Supreme Court draft decision detailing the nation’s highest court will allegedly overturn Roe v. Wadewww.foxnews.com
I'm sure Mitch will deliver for that interest group just as well as he delivered for gun owners last time the Republicans controlled all three.
There's no such thing as coincidences.
It looks to me like the establishment is creating a narrative for the mid terms that they think will be a big enough threat to distract from the economy.
The good-ole-boys club is absolutely not magically seeking a federal ban on abortion based on principle. They had all 3 branches of government and never considered it for a second. While I'd love for this to be the case, this is a state level issue and not a federal issue. I'm not dumb enough to miss the bigger narrative while they dangle a carrot in front of my face.
I'm sure Mitch will deliver for that interest group just as well as he delivered for gun owners last time the Republicans controlled all three.
Oh I agree, and I love it. Just curious if it will lead to even less Dem power.To be fair, this is the very model envisioned by the founders: each state its own N=1 experiment in democracy.
"Republicans pounce" again. They sure are "pouncey" according to my "betters" in the media. Even more than Tigger!
You've pounced me before..."Republicans pounce" again. They sure are "pouncey" according to my "betters" in the media. Even more than Tigger!
Oh, I think that's certainly possible. Maybe even probable. It's a clerk that handed it over, I think. And I kinda suspect Sotomayor. But I'm kinda thinking about Keagan too if we're speculating. She's an 0bama appointee from his own inner circle.My money is still on it being bought. The timing is just too perfect, either somebody offered the documents for sale or dem strategists made some phone calls.
I can see some woke zealot handing them over, but the timing is what takes me away from that idea.
More like locking and loadingKeep it between the ditches folks. When the Roe v Wade riots start I figure a lot of thread-locking will be going on.
I have encountered a variation on this idea that makes sense to me, that this was done more to give Democrat politicians something to run on (saving abortion) rather than having to run on 0Biden's record, which is magnificently awfulIt is all political to fire up the democrat base and they will be screaming about it till November.
AgreedI don't think he's planning on delivering anything, other than more democrat seats in congress.
Улица Усачеваtrying to figure out where the line is for meat and potatoes.
Then wouldn't Breyer be able to leak it without much to worry about?No, she gets sworn in mid-summer. I think that's when Breyer is officially retiring.
Now if it's actually a justice that leaked it? Oh, **** would not hit the fan. That's too big for public onsumption. They'll use all they have to shut that story down. It would likely get blamed on a clerk.