Is Iran Prepares To Shut Down Strait Of Hormuz

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CSORuger

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2011
    1,054
    36
    Brownsburg Indiana
    Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces Major General Hassan Firouzabali said that military plans have been drawn up to close the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, but added Iranian forces won’t shut it down until they receive the go-ahead from Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei.

    In addition to drawing up plans for the strait’s closure and awaiting permission from Iran’s supreme leader, the Iranian Parliament, or Majlis, still needs to give final approval.

    Earlier this month, the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Iranian Parliament drafted a bill requiring the government to stop all oil tankers shipping to those countries that support sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union against Iran’s oil sales.

    Senior lawmaker Javad Karimi Qoddousi outlined some of the draft law’s provisions: “Based on the draft bill, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz will continue until the annulment of all the sanctions imposed against Iran, and the government will be allowed to open the strait only after meeting 14 conditions.”

    He said the legislation also includes imposing a three-percent tariff on ships carrying other cargos destined for oil-importing countries, such as the U.S. and E.U. countries that support sanctions against Iran.

    The tariff, he said, will be one of the conditions for opening the waterway to those countries’ oil tankers, and payment must be wired to Iran’s Central Bank, on which the West also has imposed sanctions.

    Another Iranian lawmaker, Mehdi Moussavinejad, said that the draft legislation will be submitted to the parliament’s presiding board in late July to be put on the calendar for “double-urgency” consideration by all members of the Majilis.

    This could mean that any final decision approved by the Majlis may not be forthcoming until late July, with Khamenei making a final decision by early August.
     

    9mmfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 26, 2011
    5,085
    63
    Mishawaka
    Really? One US aircraft carrier group says they don't. 75 odd aircraft blowing your ships up and downing your aircraft has a habit of making a country step back.
     

    indykid

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 27, 2008
    11,938
    113
    Westfield
    Somehow I can't imagine Saudi Arabia allowing it since the stand to lose the most if Iran goes off the edge. Then again I honestly don't know whether the Saudis use the Red Sea or the Persian Gulf to export their oil.
     

    88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    Somehow I can't imagine Saudi Arabia allowing it since the stand to lose the most if Iran goes off the edge. Then again I honestly don't know whether the Saudis use the Red Sea or the Persian Gulf to export their oil.

    Kuwait and Qatar might have something to say about it as well.
     

    IndyBeerman

    Was a real life Beerman.....
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 2, 2008
    7,700
    113
    Plainfield
    Really? One US aircraft carrier group says they don't. 75 odd aircraft blowing your ships up and downing your aircraft has a habit of making a country step back.

    Correction, TWO carrier groups.

    They have moved up deployment and now will have two carrier groups in the region @ all times.

    Looks like the Navy might be ready to start taking names and kicking butts.
     

    gunowner930

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 25, 2010
    1,859
    38
    Ignore this crap. Their navy is not capable of engaging the U.S. Navy in anyway, shape, or form. Generally speaking, the Iranian Armed Forces are a complete joke and U.S. Armed Forces would skullf--- them in any sort of military conflict, whether it be a naval engagement over the Straits of Hormuz or a full-fledged invasion of Iran.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 13, 2009
    1,168
    38
    Southern, IN
    You don't really think the Pacifist in Chief would attack his dear friends in the most misunderstood of brotherly Muslim countries Iran do youi? We just need to talk to them and we can work this out. They deserve to have nukes just as much we do! If the baloon goes up, look for Israel to get in early and repeatedly cause I wouldn't put much faith in BHO pulling the trigger on this one unless its after the fact and we have already suffered a big hit/damage.
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    As was said upthread, this saber-rattling is periodic, and probably designed to cause oil prices to climb as speculators worry about what might happen if Iran actually succeeds. Add to that the recent incident where our Navy fired on a small boat approaching one of our ships.

    While I suspect our current CinC would prefer to take no military action against any of his Muslim pals, it would be politically disastrous for him if Iran succeeded in closing the Straits, so he won't muzzle the Navy when the time comes, if it comes.
     

    jeremy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 18, 2008
    16,482
    36
    Fiddler's Green
    It's that time of year again already?!

    Damn how time flies...

    I seen up thread some mentioned the Saudis. They could give a damn less about the Straights. Now Kuwait, Dubai, UAE those are a different story. Not to mention what the hell is Iran going to do with a couple of dozen glorified ski boats anyway...
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    It's that time of year again already?!

    Damn how time flies...

    I seen up thread some mentioned the Saudis. They could give a damn less about the Straights. Now Kuwait, Dubai, UAE those are a different story. Not to mention what the hell is Iran going to do with a couple of dozen glorified ski boats anyway...

    Not that I disagree with your assessment of Iran's Navy, they could do sufficient damage to close the Straits if they had either the element of surprise or an unexpected weapons capability to deploy, both of which are conceivable, if not probable.
     

    jeremy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 18, 2008
    16,482
    36
    Fiddler's Green
    Not that I disagree with your assessment of Iran's Navy, they could do sufficient damage to close the Straits if they had either the element of surprise or an unexpected weapons capability to deploy, both of which are conceivable, if not probable.
    The Navies of Kuwait, Dubai, and the UAE watch them pretty sharply...
    The Straights are there lifeline and they know how fragile their Finance may become and how rapidly at that if Iran were to attempt to close the Straights...
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    They like to sound BIG but can't step up and do a thing!

    Sadaam Hussein had something like the fifth or sixth largest military in the world when we took him down in 1993 (of course, our military is about 50% smaller now than it was then), and it was hardly more difficult to take them out the second time than it was the first time. Iran might expect help from Russia or China if we got into it with them (Iran), but the outcome - short of direct involvement with Russian or Chinese forces (ala Korea and Vietnam) would not likely change the outcome. They know it, and we know it.

    That's one reason why they've sunk so much of their funding into terror organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas; such organizations are relatively "deniable" but still give them the capability to inflict damage on their enemies.
     

    2ADMNLOVER

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    May 13, 2009
    5,122
    63
    West side Indy
    an unexpected weapons capability to deploy, both of which are conceivable, if not probable.

    short of direct involvement with Russian or Chinese forces (ala Korea and Vietnam) would not likely change the outcome. They know it, and we know it..


    Both of the above are the 64K dollar questions . Who knows what new weapons they (Iran) have yet to unveil ?

    Sure skill and technology goes a long way but lucky shots ain't bad either .

    Who knows the measure of their (Russia & China) resolve when it comes to stopping our meddling and imperialistic ways .

    Their respective militaries are starting to work together more than they used to . I'm bettin that's a "clue" .
     
    Top Bottom