Is a 45-70 1895 Marlin Dark Series a good compromise?

[1nderbeard]

JM stamped Marlins are the "old" marlins. They are nice rifles. The new ones, I hear are not nice.

I describe my 'modern' marlin 336 also. Meant to more clearly say it was not a JM. It is not as nice, but functions just fine.

 

[Duce]

A 45/70 is a heavy recoil rifle, heavier bullet, more recoil. Muzzle brakes/porting increase muzzle blast.
For a light fast handling lever rifle, look for an older/used Marlin in 30/30 or .35 Rem. Either will make a good deer rifle in Indiana. Ammo for the 30/30 is available nearly everywhere.
Hang on to that .270. It's a good long range rifle. If recoil and muzzle flip is a problem, look into reduced recoil loadings. My experience with heavy recoil in .270, was with my father's lightweight model 70. He reloaded heavier bullets in it. With no recoil pad, thoroughly an unpleasant rifle to shoot.
Now if you still don't like the way a bolt gun carrys, look into a single shot. I own a H&R in .270, took deer with it. The one draw back with it is weight, recoil is very manageable. If you decide to go that way look into CVA Scout V2.≤≥≤ Duce

 

[wingrider1800]

I have a cva scout in 44 mag. It is short, light and easy to handle. Recoil is also mild. It has less felt recoil that my Marlin 1894 44 mag.

 

[tv1217]

I've tried probably a dozen .45-70 factory loads and the recoil is variable anywhere from light to "I'mma need rotator cuff surgery if I keep shooting those"