I sort of agree with this but have an issue with the 'mutual acknowledgment of all individuals right as people to think and be different from [me] ...', but my disagreement may lie in the forcing of agreement on such things. I am reminded of the current push to force acceptance of 'women with a penis' and associated claptrap. I think 'tolerance' and 'acceptance' provides top cover to dilute revulsion for all sorts of perversion under the cover of it being just 'differences' and part of the 'normal' human spectrum. Some things, like Lolita island and it's enablers, need to be forever beyond the pale
The idea of mutual acknowledgement is predicated on whether it affects individual rights or not. It does not affect me if someone has some sort of condition which causes them to believe they're really the opposite sex. It's not my business. I acknowledge that person's right to believe that. They've not harmed me by believing that. It's a bit different when agreement with it becomes coerced. Then my rights have been violated and I have every right not to accept/tolerate that.
And of course Lolita Island exploited young teens. We're under no moral obligation to accept or tolerate that either.