Gr666mer Updates

[TheTrooper]

 

[TheTrooper]

 

[KLB]

View attachment 247539

That was not what you think it was. We discussed him around here somewhere.

 

[MartinHouse]

View attachment 247539

How is this different than showing a picture of the Uvalde school shooter as a representative of gun owners?

 

[TheTrooper]

I had no idea we had a coven of grooming apologists in here. Makes you wonder what else they are up to.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

How is this different than showing a picture of the Uvalde school shooter as a representative of gun owners?

View attachment 247540

The caption says "perverts" in our schools grooming our kids. It's not like it says that all teachers are perverts. Who is it you object to being lumped in with who?

 

[TheTrooper]

Having children openly celebrate sodomy in a classroom is also a predatory grooming technique. Not all teachers are bad, but some are definitely degenerate psychopath predators and should be called out and never allowed around children again. Those enabling them should get the same treatment.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

I'm interested in who you are calling "perverts".

In this case, people who want to push their sexual fantasies on children.

 

[TheTrooper]

I'm interested in who you are calling "perverts".

Would it help if I used the terms "obviously child focused degenerate psychopaths"? Or "delusional openly operating pedophile abusers"?
Now I am interested in exactly what distinction you trying to carve out for yourself.

 

[Ingomike]

He joins in November but does not post until today, then posts in two different threads on similar subject matter. Hmmmm

 

[DoggyDaddy]

He joins in November but does not post until today, then posts in two different threads on similar subject matter. Hmmmm

Epicenity reincarnated?

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Epicenity reincarnated?

I didn't want to be the first one to say it, but the writing style, the timing of posts, it all seems extremely familiar...

 

[DoggyDaddy]

I didn't want to be the first one to say it, but the writing style, the timing of posts, it all seems extremely familiar...

Yes indeed.

 

[KG1]

 

[MartinHouse]

Would is help if I used the term "obviouly child focused degenerate psychopaths"? Or "delusional openly operating pedophile abusers"?
Now I am intereseted in exactly what distinction are you trying to carve out for yourself?

Well, no. Of course nobody wants predators in schools. I just noticed that a lot people are calling people those things only on the basis of not being heterosexuals.

How many predators are openly operating in schools?

 

[tude]

Well, no. Of course nobody wants predators in schools. I just noticed that a lot people are calling people those things only on the basis of not being heterosexuals.

How many predators are openly operating in schools?

Too many!

 

[jamil]

Well, no. Of course nobody wants predators in schools. I just noticed that a lot people are calling people those things only on the basis of not being heterosexuals.

How many predators are openly operating in schools?

Any examples on INGO?

 

[BugI02]

Well, no. Of course nobody wants predators in schools. I just noticed that a lot people are calling people those things only on the basis of not being heterosexuals.

How many predators are openly operating in schools?

It isn't solely because they aren't heterosexual, it is because they wish to proselytize for their particular letter in LGBTQ etc among the impressionable minds of children

 

[jamil]

Well, no. Of course nobody wants predators in schools. I just noticed that a lot people are calling people those things only on the basis of not being heterosexuals.

How many predators are openly operating in schools?

I think you may have assigned that cause without reason. If you're a gender activist teacher pushing gender queer ideology to children it's highly likely that you're, as Bug suggested, one of those letters in LGBTQIA+. The people using "groomer" language are equal opportunity. They'll point the finger at any of those letters as they apply.

But, I don't think the individuals who belong to that group of letters are inherently gender activists. Except maybe the Q's. And that's kinda by definition, isn't it? Because Q isn't as much a gender as it is an ideology. It's not only members of the alphabet gang doing the indoctrinating either. It's, as Dave Chappelle puts it, "white feminist bitches" too.

 

[jamil]

Incidentally, the Pedo's don't really get their own letter. They fit within Q.