About the only claim I would make is that it would also be delusional to think that the convictions represent anything more than a tiny fraction of the amount of voting fraud that actually occurred.Using actual conviction records to show voter fraud happens is also a solid story, such that denying their existence would be the delusional side to take up. But it if the claim is that an election was stolen, there would need to be more information that gets to the scale of impact for all those cases.
And that it will only get more sophisticated with time.