NoThis is likely an unpopular opinion among the INGOtariate, but I cut her some slack. Brain-damage jokes aside, she has personal, principled reasons for her positions.
In the same manner I think that it is fair that we discuss the ideas being put forward, and not the person. Her latest statements prove what many people have long believed - that "common sense gun control" is a phrase used to undermine legal ownership of firearms. That every concession is not enough, and the next demand for "something to be done" is just around the corner.I can disagree with her while acknowledging the reality that she is a true victim of gun violence.
No
No, she doesn't. She just a vile little fascist.
In the same manner I think that it is fair that we discuss the ideas being put forward, and not the person. Her latest statements prove what many people have long believed - that "common sense gun control" is a phrase used to undermine legal ownership of firearms. That every concession is not enough, and the next demand for "something to be done" is just around the corner.
This is likely an unpopular opinion among the INGOtariate, but I cut her some slack. Brain-damage jokes aside, she has personal, principled reasons for her positions.
I can disagree with her while acknowledging the reality that she is a true victim of gun violence.
Yup. If you want to reduce deaths from "gun violence" then access to mental health services is a hugely positive step. After all most gun deaths are the result of suicide.It was not the gun used that instigated her situation.
The nut job has a paper trail of Psychosis a mile and a half long and no one acted on any of it.
Put more control on folks like him.
Get them some help or separate them from society.
Death by a thousand papercutsGreat example of the left never being happy until they achieve total disarmament. drip...drip...drip
...I can disagree with her while acknowledging the reality that she is a true victim of gun violence.
This is likely an unpopular opinion among the INGOtariate, but I cut her some slack. Brain-damage jokes aside, she has personal, principled reasons for her positions.
I can disagree with her while acknowledging the reality that she is a true victim of gun violence.
I would cut her some slack on that.While she is a victim, would she be cut slack for trying to ban cars if she had been hit by one?
My guess is Gabby really couldn't care less about guns. Yes she was a victim of gun violence but that is somewhat secondary. If I remember correctly her husband was a gun owner. What we have here is a situation where being a spokesperson for an agenda pays better then any other gig she can land. It's her job an Oregon obviously allows her a opportunity to ply her trade.