I can't tell - are you saying, "using unjustified force to infringe upon others' freedom to exercise their rights." is what Trump and others are calling for with this "send in the military" clarion call?
Are we on the same side of this argument?
The right wing has butthurt that protestors/occupiers have a flag that's offensive - doesn't matter what it says or means.
Butthurt is not a valid reason to get medieval on their collective asses.
So much straw man.
It's not that the flag is offensive; rather, it is that the flag communicates an intent to infringe upon the rights of others. (Functionally, the flag's message "We Will Tread" is no different from "I'm going to kill you".) I'm not offended by that flag, at all. It merely states their intent. By all means; let them try. Molon Labe, mother ****ers.
And to be very clear: no, the military should not be sent in merely because a flag is flown. But if those who carry the flag act in such a way to corresponds to their communicated intent (which, again, is to infringe upon the rights of others), then a response is warranted. The scale of that response should be commensurate with the scale of their action. So, there could be a degree of action that warrants a military response - and there could be a degree of action that warrants a lesser use of force.