- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
So, start demonstrating.Your statement is demonstrably false.
So, start demonstrating.Your statement is demonstrably false.
Buildings don't burn and people don't loot while peacefully protesting. Do you need pictures? Google will have plenty. But according to you BLM is not a racist organization because they had black founding members. I just thought I'd remind you of that.Your statement is demonstrably false.
Because they give the best BJs? One of their other personalities did it? Because I they’re a white woman, and I’m not supposed to touch them? So many to choose.What's the craziest excuse you've been given for why you shouldn't arrest someone?
There had been over 450 BLM protests by the end of May 2020. For your statement to be true 226 of those would have to satisfy your “violent rioting” criteria. You prepared to make that claim?So, start demonstrating.
Yeah, didn’t say that, nor imply. Anyone who would believe that something isn’t racist because it has Black founding members is slow. I can think of a number of Black founded orgs that are racist.Buildings don't burn and people don't loot while peacefully protesting. Do you need pictures? Google will have plenty. But according to you BLM is not a racist organization because they had black founding members. I just thought I'd remind you of that.
You said a organization called NAAWP (as in white people) would not be racist if it had black founding members. Do you not feel the same about BLM ?Yeah, didn’t say that.
If memory serves, you tried to call the NAACP racist, while ranting about the image awards. It was apparently unknown to you that it had several White founding members. You tried to contrast with the NAAWP, asking if the founders has been partially Black would it be racist. I said no. Aside from the “what’s the point” of such an organization, in America, You could’ve easily inserted Asian, Latino, Native American, and my answer remained the same.You said a organization called NAAWP (as in white people) would not be racist if it had black founding members. Do you not feel the same about BLM ?
How about breaking it down by hours on the job rather than number of times three or more got together?There had been over 450 BLM protests by the end of May 2020. For your statement to be true 226 of those would have to satisfy your “violent rioting” criteria. You prepared to make that claim?
There had been over 450 BLM protests by the end of May 2020. For your statement to be true 226 of those would have to satisfy your “violent rioting” criteria. You prepared to make that claim?
Now you're moving the goalposts into the stands. I gave you relevant information that puts your original statement on tenuous grounds, and now your asking me to give you a breakdown of hours for each protest?How about breaking it down by hours on the job rather than number of times three or more got together?
Your memory has failed you. My issue was it was on 11 stations. I don't care if it's a quilting bee that's too much coverage. Thanks to you the thread was deleted like many others you have sh*t on. I'm sure you're ok with this one being deleted as well. When you start getting your ass handed to you that always happens.If memory serves, you tried to call the NAACP racist, while ranting about the image awards. It was apparently unknown to you that it had several White founding members. You tried to contrast with the NAAWP, asking if the founders has been partially Black would it be racist. I said no. Aside from the “what’s the point” of such an organization, in America, You could’ve easily inserted Asian, Latino, Native American, and my answer remained the same.
The point I am making is that most of the calendar over the past 12 months has had BLM violence somewhere. No one else, at least domestically, can make that claim.Now you're moving the goalposts into the stands. I gave you relevant information that puts your original statement on tenuous grounds, and now your asking me to give you a breakdown of hours for each protest?
Oh, and BTW there IS a NAAWP. Founded by David Duke. So yeah.
No need to. I looked at the study it lists 7750 BLM protests. So yeah, if “hundreds” have turned violent, then you’ve just significantly increased the disparity between peaceful and violent stats I offered earlier.
Critcize the source in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... The study was done by Princeton, BTW, and over only a 4 month period
If you left it at that, I wouldn’t have had an argument to make. I can freely admit as much.The point I am making is that most of the calendar over the past 12 months has had BLM violence somewhere. No one else, at least domestically, can make that claim.
This is irrelevant. No one is talking about financing.Uh....ok...right.
Do they get federal funding?
Plain silliness.
This is irrelevant. No one is talking about financing.