Are you saying that it's OK to investigate people for buying filters or that since one government group overreaches, everyone should?
You would have to define "engaged" in order for your statement to convey your meaning. For example, Jen Psaki doesn't do anything but feed us crap, yet I would consider a threat on behalf of the Biden administration coming from her mouth to represent the administration.If this specific person engaged in such activities, I agree.
Regardless, it creates doubt.This is BS.The Prosecution Did Not Even Address The Video Clip From Chauvins's Lawyer Where Floyd Said “I Ate Too Many Drugs” (Video)
The trial of Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis officer charged in George Floyd’s death, is continuing Wednesday after the prosecution this week hasdefiantamerica.com
If you listen closely...he says "I ate too many Frito's and cheese".
It may be burritos and cheese, or Doritos.
No more than I think all NRA members are gun crazy nuts...although some probably are...I would guess that there are plenty of people that don't think it's thin conjecture when BLM members state that places will be burned.
View attachment 134407
View attachment 134409
There are people that probably think it's a credible threat.
No more than I think all NRA members are gun crazy nuts...although some probably are...
No more than I think some here believe QAnon although some probably do....
No more than I think anyone with a Virginia battle flag is a white supremacist....although some probably are...
Worried about the other two examples?What was the last terror attack committed by the NRA, that was equally recognized by NRA leadership and carried out by NRA members?
So if a someone who associates with a Cartel tells you that you have to do what the Cartel wants or they will burn your house down.Worried about the other two examples?
Worried about the other two examples?
Yeah, that statement is contested, the context indicates he didn’t say that.... but let’s say that he did. Other posters have indicated that because Floyd didnt tell officers he had used drugs, they weren’t aware to treat him appropriately, and are alleviated from providing care. Now people are saying he admitted to taking too much dope, so wouldn’t that mean Chauvin was negligent in his care? I’m just trying to see how this flip flop is being defended.Interesting tidbit from the Chauvin trail today.
" I ate too many drugs." George Floyd
Nelson does it again, and Reyerson agrees that's what he said.
Your examples are outliers within their groups. BLM's primary activity throughout its existence has been violent rioting. "Mostly peaceful" was, is, and most likely will continue to be a fiction.No more than I think all NRA members are gun crazy nuts...although some probably are...
No more than I think some here believe QAnon although some probably do....
No more than I think anyone with a Virginia battle flag is a white supremacist....although some probably are...
Yeah, that statement is contested, the context indicates he didn’t say that.... but let’s say that he did. Other posters have indicated that because Floyd didnt tell officers he had used drugs, they weren’t aware to treat him appropriately, and are alleviated from providing care. Now people are saying he admitted to taking too much dope, so wouldn’t that mean Chauvin was negligent in his care? I’m just trying to see how this flip flop is being defended.
Your statement is demonstrably false.Your examples are outliers within their groups. BLM's primary activity throughout its existence has been violent rioting. "Mostly peaceful" was, is, and most likely will continue to be a fiction.
I do not see the flip flop. The failure on the part of Floyd &Co. to address the overdose, thus impeding any chance of saving him, was my personal issue. The closest I came to embracing the assertion that Floyd's garbled pig Latin addressed too many drugs was to acknowledge that this moment in court could create doubts in the minds of the jurors. That is not an endorsement of the claims validity, just its potential utility.Yeah, that statement is contested, the context indicates he didn’t say that.... but let’s say that he did. Other posters have indicated that because Floyd didnt tell officers he had used drugs, they weren’t aware to treat him appropriately, and are alleviated from providing care. Now people are saying he admitted to taking too much dope, so wouldn’t that mean Chauvin was negligent in his care? I’m just trying to see how this flip flop is being defended.
It's obvious " I can't breathe" while resisting arrest doesn't work.What's the craziest excuse you've been given for why you shouldn't arrest someone?