It boasts big flavor, but in reality is a bit lacking.Is that the thick kinda syrup, or the runny kind?!
It boasts big flavor, but in reality is a bit lacking.Is that the thick kinda syrup, or the runny kind?!
I have been on his list since 2004...
Is that the thick kinda syrup, or the runny kind?!
You forgot to ask about [STRIKE]the bribe [/STRIKE][STRIKE]the blackmail [/STRIKE]the lawsuit.
Who started it and why did it just go away?
Why won't his teammates talk and where are they now?
Or, have they talked....
You guys are not done.
The syrup thickens!
Do you really know and trust your instructor?
Never let it be said that I will not listen to both sides of a situation.
http://web.archive.org/web/200606160...AR_Yeager.html
- Interesting write up (supposedly from Yeager).
If what he describes is true I can not disagree with the issues he has raised concerning the companies alleged method of operation. In fact I can see, if it is true, where those conditions would be very frustrating not to mention a danger to the men working in them.
That does not mean to say that I agree with his alleged actions in the official AAR. In fact it doesn't have anything to do with the actions described in the official AAR.
I do have to say it is nice to see he admits to screwing up with the vehicle. I am not so impressed with what seems to be a continual reference to his being the only one following sop. It seemed to me like his constant excuse for leaving his team mates.
While he did give praise to several of his team mates I could not help but find the comment about "Steph" to be odd. Almost like he was insinuating that the situation occurred because "Steph" discounted "the Dicker" and perhaps the reason Yeager couldn't identify where the attack was coming from was because "Steph" "did not relay the info on the shooter" to him... but perhaps I am reading into it.
http://web.archive.org/web/200606160...er_Yeager.html
Supposedly Yeagers account of the incident itself. Again very interesting. While there are portions that sound like marketing lingo and attempts to justify actions (rather than just stating what happened) it basically (IMO) differs from the AAR pretty significantly.
In Yeagers description he does more than just fire 15 rounds and run away in addition he claims he did not shoot two civilians but two members of a "clean up crew of insurgants (article here: http://web.archive.org/web/200606160..._Callinan.html ). There are several other statements he makes that I would question but there really is no benefit in completely dissecting his testimony here, better you read it and make your own conclusions.
Is it possible that they are using the only american as a scape goat? Yes it is possible and can not be discounted especially if he was branded as a "trouble maker" by the company.
My question would be if any of the surviving team members (with the exception of Team leader who he clearly did not like) has come forward and backed his account of events and if not why?
In any case interesting reads. Here is the link to the "main" link page:
http://web.archive.org/web/200606130.../****ersm.com/
Imagine that...and they didn't like him
Imagine that...
He needs replaced? Or just ignored?!?The reason MR Yeager is discussed so much on INGO is because he is out there putting out content multiple times a week. Since he has "so many" haters, who are we gonna replace him with? Who is gonna step up?
The reason MR Yeager is discussed so much on INGO is because he is out there putting out content multiple times a week. Since he has "so many" haters, who are we gonna replace him with? Who is gonna step up?
He needs a full line of products. Someone should someone make a pancake batter box, replace the Aunt Jemima picture with Ahole Jeremy pancake batter mix. "I'll beat you and make pancakes"
Prototype phase....... still has a high failure rate.
I can't imagine it would have a failure to EJECT
Keep this up and you might earn a spot on the pancake list too ....
...Or just ignored?!?