No majority exists on what to replace with if that majority succeeds so the point is moot…You're making a distinction without a difference. Of people with an opinion on the matter, that opinion is 3:1 in favor of stopping the practice of changing clocks twice a year.
I said absolutely nothing about "voting". I'm refuting your arguments that a) changing clocks is popular, and b) no strong majority exists on the question of continuing vs stopping the practice of changing clocks.
Edit: voting meant supporting not actually voting in my context.
Last edited: