Well, the Dems are instigating insurrection right now, so by THEIR OWN RULES, they must be removed from the ballot.Finish the middle game and onto the end game. Red states start removing Democrats from the ballot.
Well, the Dems are instigating insurrection right now, so by THEIR OWN RULES, they must be removed from the ballot.Finish the middle game and onto the end game. Red states start removing Democrats from the ballot.
No. It includes general election. So if it stands, Trump cannot be on the ballot for the general election.Just so I'm clear, the Colorado Supremes only ruled that Trump cannot appear on their primary ballot, right?
With the authority to interpret and enforce law. Ain't supposed to work like that. Just another example of how broken the system is.They’re basically activists.
Write a strongly worded email?You're going to have a rough time as things continue to unfold, then.
I guess you're the type that welcomes in a home intruder and makes them a sandwich. This situation is more dire than someone breaking into your house, this is someone attempting to take over the country.
I don't know how it can be spelled out in a more obvious way than someone literally removing the opposition candidate from the vote. A candidate largely believed to have the polling to win the election.
Tell me, when you can no longer vote your way out of a situation, what option is left?
Bear in mind this is written by the petitioners... So take with a grain of salt.Interesting article.
Most removed from office right after the Civil War. One guy in 1919 who was actually convicted of espionage, but later got it overturned and served in Congress. And one guy convicted of trespass (yes...trespass) in 2022.
None of them Presidents, of course.
The 14th amendment says people who took an oath to “support the constitution” every federal officer swears to “support and defend” the constitutionBear in mind this is written by the petitioners... So take with a grain of salt.
What I found interesting was all of their examples were concrete examples. Folks "working for" the confederacy. None of them were based on speech or opinions.
If you think that threats of violence towards judges who rule against your beliefs are OK, you are clearly beyond reasoned discussion. These judges did not break into my home, and, for the record, if they (or you) did try it, what you would be getting from me would not be a sandwich. What a patently ridiculous, Neanderthal thing to say.
At least they have superiors. Hopefully SCOTUS will bitch-slap them. Personally, I think they should be impeached. They denied due process. They usurped power they don't have. If this stands, every red state should do the same to Democrats. Find something plausible to accuse them of and just remove them from the ballot. Let's not stop at POTUS. Representatives. Senators. Show them the world they propose is unlivable by forcing them to live in it.With the authority to interpret and enforce law. Ain't supposed to work like that. Just another example of how broken the system is.
Dan Patrick suggests taking Biden off ballot in Texas
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) on Tuesday suggested taking President Biden off the ballot in Texas due to his handling of immigration, citing the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling to kick forme…thehill.com
Why do you guys keep Kathy Newman-ing people. The subject is specifically, threatening violence against those CO justices. Being against that is not making any specific statement about the highlighted. It's not time to grab your musket and head to the town square. Just hold on. We'll tell you if it's time. Just keep your powder dry.So it's patently ridiculous to point out that we're eliminating voting in this country, and declaring a dictatorship?
I ask you, what other purpose does this serve than effectively terminating the election?
I think LG made it pretty clear that he wants Trump to be disqualified. Not for the riots mind you but for the fake elector scheme. I guess in his mind that's: "insurrection."I'd like to hear a complete explanation by TDS'ers who support this ruling. Do you support it because you like the outcome? Is that it? **** rule of law? **** due process? Do you think a state supreme court has the authority to judge that such a crime has been committed without any charges, or trial?
C'mon. Justify yourself. Come out of the woodwork. Make your case. Anyone? @LeftyGunner? Anything?
It is still without due process. No trial. No guilt adjudicated by peers. We don't convict people of stuff just because in our opinion it's self evident. I think it wouldn't be too cathy-newman of me to say, "so you hate rule of law."I think LG made it pretty clear that he wants Trump to be disqualified. Not for the riots mind you but for the fake elector scheme. I guess in his mind that's: "insurrection."
If the collective "we" knows when it's time, the collective "we" should be able to tell us ahead of time when it will be time. At least give us some idea.We'll tell you if it's time. Just keep your powder dry.
Okay. Not yet.If the collective "we" knows when it's time, the collective "we" should be able to tell us ahead of time when it will be time. At least give us some idea.
Well, I guess to be fair he may not be for the way this went down and would rather Trump be convicted in a court of law. He can answer for himself, but I know for certain that he wants Trump to be disqualified.It is still without due process. No trial. No guilt adjudicated by peers. We don't convict people of stuff just because in our opinion it's self evident. I think it wouldn't be too cathy-newman of me to say, "so you hate rule of law."