Civil Religious Discussions : all things Christianity II

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Since when did prophecy just become predicting future events?
    And these "prophets" fail when it's a 50/50 proposition.

    And why do people think that God can't work unless their man is in the WH?
    Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery
    None but ourselves can free our minds
    Have no fear for atomic energy
    'Cause none of them can stop the time
    How long shall they kill our prophets
    While we stand aside and look? Ooh
    Some say it's just a part of it
    We've got to fullfil the book - Redemption Song Mr Bob Marley
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    What say INGO?


    https://www.russellmoore.com/2021/03/03/is-the-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-unethical/

    I'm not clear on what constitutes "cell lines derived from an aborted human fetus". But it seems this from an abortion done in 1985. I'm kind of the opinion that it's water under the bridge on that one.

    There's almost a parallel to knocking over statutes - medical history is just as messy as everything else, and digging 35 years in past for some dirt...
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,351
    113
    NWI
    There is nothing wrong with murdering homeless people to harvest their organs.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,194
    149
    Valparaiso
    What say INGO?


    https://www.russellmoore.com/2021/03/03/is-the-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-unethical/

    I'm not clear on what constitutes "cell lines derived from an aborted human fetus". But it seems this from an abortion done in 1985. I'm kind of the opinion that it's water under the bridge on that one.

    There's almost a parallel to knocking over statutes - medical history is just as messy as everything else, and digging 35 years in past for some dirt...

    I understand that they are drawing a line in the sand and I can respect that.

    However, I would not have an issue with someone who is pro-life getting the J & J vaccine. I do not draw my line in the same place. My line is closer to something that promotes abortion currently. Even President Bush's stem cell announcement (which no one remembers because it came a month before 9/11) allowed for federal funding of research using cell lines obtained from aborted fetuses in the distant past and if I remember right, that was widely accepted by pro-life people.

    That being said, I have Novavax in me or will have and that has no such issues.
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    And saying that ysing aborted fetuses is parallel to knocking over statues is civil?

    Joe Mengala would be proud of you.
    If you have a civil and cogent opinion on the issue, then make it.

    Otherwise, take those sorts of snide remarks to Gen Pol section.


    As to this issue, I really don't have a personal problem with J&J or other vaccines that are developed using cloned cells from events that took place over decades ago. I don't believe that me taking that vaccine is contributing or in any way promoting abortion.

    I see the Catholic church doing what they do best - being Pharisaical. (IMHO, of course)
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,351
    113
    NWI
    If you have a civil and cogent opinion on the issue, then make it.

    Otherwise, take those sorts of snide remarks to Gen Pol section.


    As to this issue, I really don't have a personal problem with J&J or other vaccines that are developed using cloned cells from events that took place over decades ago. I don't believe that me taking that vaccine is contributing or in any way promoting abortion.

    I see the Catholic church doing what they do best - being Pharisaical. (IMHO, of course)


    Life is not a Political issue.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    I think that the decision(s) regarding the vaccines, and any medical product derived from aborted stem cells, is a matter of informed conscience.

    Just MHO.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,822
    113
    I believe Bush outlawed use of new fetus material leaving only previously collected materials in play.

    I also thought science had advanced to where it could now get fetus quality cells without fetus cells.
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    I believe Bush outlawed use of new fetus material leaving only previously collected materials in play.

    I also thought science had advanced to where it could now get fetus quality cells without fetus cells.
    Sounds like that's the case.


    "Fetal tissue can be used in biomedical research for transplantation material and other purposes, but is more often connected to the creation of “immortalized” cell lines. Immortalized cell lines are established by culturing fetal cells in such a way that they continue growing and multiplying in laboratory dishes indefinitely. These cells can then be used for such activities as testing a drug’s ability to damage genetic material or to test the effects of specific viral infection. "

     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    And saying that ysing aborted fetuses is parallel to knocking over statues is civil?

    Joe Mengala would be proud of you.
    OK, I think I can address this now in a way that lays out a crude analogy as I see it.



    A vaccine is developed based on cells that were cloned from an abortion(s) many decades ago.
    Does that make it inherently immoral?

    A university was founded by a prominent slave owner many (many) decades ago.
    Does that make it inherently immoral?
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    As to this issue, I really don't have a personal problem with J&J or other vaccines that are developed using cloned cells from events that took place over decades ago. I don't believe that me taking that vaccine is contributing or in any way promoting abortion.
    So what is your opinion about german companies that willingly used jewish slave labor during The Two? After all, it was 'events that took place decades ago'

    The point being that distance in the past has little bearing on certain issues and some things cannot be forgiven. To drink from a tainted well is to poison yourself
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    OK, I think I can address this now in a way that lays out a crude analogy as I see it.



    A vaccine is developed based on cells that were cloned from an abortion(s) many decades ago.
    Does that make it inherently immoral?

    A university was founded by a prominent slave owner many (many) decades ago.
    Does that make it inherently immoral?
    At the risk of analogy-poking, as a society, we've eradicated slavery.

    Mostly.

    Not so much abortion.

    In law, there's this idea of "fruit of a poisonous tree." That's similar to the idea about the abortion derived stem cells. That, even though the decision was made decades ago, the unexculpated moral fault still taints it.

    But again, each of us has a God-given conscience to guide us. There is room for reasonable people to reach different conclusions on this.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    A vaccine is developed based on cells that were cloned from an abortion(s) many decades ago.
    Does that make it inherently immoral?
    'The gold was smelted from fillings gathered in The Shoah, does that make it inherently immoral?'

    Wide is the gate and broad is the way
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    So what is your opinion about german companies that willingly used jewish slave labor during The Two? After all, it was 'events that took place decades ago'

    The point being that distance in the past has little bearing on certain issues and some things cannot be forgiven. To drink from a tainted well is to poison yourself
    Are you asking if I drive a Volkswagen?
    Are you asking if I agree with reparation?
    Am I drinking from a tainted well by living in America?
    I like Dan Levy's acting on Schitt's Creek... is that a well tainted with glitter?


    In law, there's this idea of "fruit of a poisonous tree." That's similar to the idea about the abortion derived stem cells. That, even though the decision was made decades ago, the unexculpated moral fault still taints it.

    But again, each of us has a God-given conscience to guide us. There is room for reasonable people to reach different conclusions on this.
    That concept totally came to my mind.

    If nothing else, this last year has taught me how be accepting and open of differences on issues and extending grace.
     
    Top Bottom