Tactical Dave
Grandmaster
I was trying to be humorous with the NUKE title...in hindsight I suppose it really wasn't all that funny.
I was more trying to point out that it's a barbaric way to deal "justice". I have no problem castrating rapists, but severing the spinal cord of a man---REALLY?!? How is that NOT considered torture? The inability to appeal is also something that is overlooked---what if the man in question DIDN'T start the fight, defended himself, and is now facing paralysis for defending himself?
He got in a fight with a guy and paralized him...... do you think some jail time is more fair? He would serve a few years then get out still being able to walk... this guy will not....... From what I know of that law you can only use eye fro an eye if you wer enot the agressor. If he was not but everyone else said he was then be glad you live in this country and not over there...
The problem with the people in this country is that they want to get involved in everyones buisness and tell them what they can and can't do.... It is their right to have the laws that they want to have...... if you don't like them then they should leave....... even if it means walking.....
You say castrate the rapist but even it was proven that someone was the agressor and started the fight and paralized someone you feel that they to should not be paralized......... something does not jive there.
No disrespect but if you travel to other countries and think that what you have here applies for over there you might be in for a rude awakening....... decide to get drunk and get thrown in jail and then find out they can hold you as long as they want and don't have to feed you then they tell you your wife can come and service the guards and then they will let you out... or have her come back........
The movie "Taken" is a good watch........