brotherbill3
Master
Guy had a blurb on his FB page about this saying the amendment requires you to get authorization prior to carry on property. When asked if that means it's still a felony if you don't have authorization, he replied 'yes'.
How is this different than the situation we have now?
It was a stupid amendment - but several of the proponents fell for it to try to placate the 2 naysayers who were being complete idiots (tools!)
- WE have to be quick but hopefully that can be fixed. I think even "moderate" Bray realized it - and Guy said something about he and Sandllin talked about it.
It is different -because it allows a church (as separate from a school) to give people the OK; rather than having to go to the school board as the only recourse ....
Note - Different - not better.
I'll try to get the new form / text up later when I seee it if no one beats me to it. - also link to the video.