FIFYMost Americans support Voter ID, for example. It makes sense to everyone. But voter ID makes it harder for deadpeopledemocrats to vote.
FIFYMost Americans support Voter ID, for example. It makes sense to everyone. But voter ID makes it harder for deadpeopledemocrats to vote.
Maybe not in time. If kids started honoring their parents, stopped killing each other in inner cities and these mass shootings, stopped the hookup culture, stopped stealing, stopped lying, and stopped worrying too much about what other people have, if they suddenly changed their values to think those things were important, it would be a pivotal generation, and a beginning.I don't even think the 10 commandments would slow the decline.
Yes, I suppose all people, upon their deaths, become democrats.FIFY
The USA was completely energy independent under Trump. We were even exporting oil for the first time in decades.I disagree with your core assumption: that previous economic prosperity was somehow Trump’s doing, and that Biden has been its undoing. I think the Relationship between the economy and the executive is more complicated and slower to respond than your dichotomy allows.
However, If we are looking back through the rose-colored glasses, the Obama years were my financial best, I’d take that time of my (financial) life back in a heartbeat.
I disagree with your core assumption: that previous economic prosperity was somehow Trump’s doing, and that Biden has been its undoing. I think the Relationship between the economy and the executive is more complicated and slower to respond than your dichotomy allows.
However, If we are looking back through the rose-colored glasses, the Obama years were my financial best, I’d take that time of my (financial) life back in a heartbeat.
The "misery index" was a thing during Carter's presidency. That's not a positive phrase meant to extol the virtue of Carter's policies.It's not like the economy is just off doing its own thing. The president's policies certainly affect the economy. Would you argue that Carters policies didn't cause stagflation?
That letter is dated after WSJ published the story about the hush money. Stormy Daniels was most likely still acting according to the agreement. She later admitted that it was all true. I think it's disingenuous for Jack Prosobiec to post that as if it's proof that the affair never happened.Stormy was trying to be coy with that statement. She was denying that they had an affair. Not that they never had sex or that she wasn't paid "hush money."
I think I accidently deleted my post that you quoted.That letter is dated after WSJ published the story about the hush money. Stormy Daniels was most likely still acting according to the agreement. She later admitted that it was all true. I think it's disingenuous for Jack Prosobiec to post that as if it's proof that the affair never happened.
Daniels sued Trump and Cohen saying that the NDA was invalid. The suit was dismissed after they agreed not to enforce the NDA. She sued Trump a second time for defamation and lost.
Of course the admission about having the NDA doesn't prove conclusively that the deed happened. Betting odds favor that it did.
If Trump used campaign funds to pay her off and didn't disclose it, that's a problem. It's not a problem worthy of a felony, and certainly not 134 years in prison.
It's not like the economy is just off doing its own thing. The president's policies certainly affect the economy. Would you argue that Carters policies didn't cause stagflation?
Lot's of people pay for NDA's with their own money which Trump did. It's not a crime. I think it was Dershowitz that said should they then have to record the details of what the NDA was for in the books subject to public records? That would defeat the purpose of an NDA.That letter is dated after WSJ published the story about the hush money. Stormy Daniels was most likely still acting according to the agreement. She later admitted that it was all true. I think it's disingenuous for Jack Prosobiec to post that as if it's proof that the affair never happened.
Daniels sued Trump and Cohen saying that the NDA was invalid. The suit was dismissed after they agreed not to enforce the NDA. She sued Trump a second time for defamation and lost.
Of course the admission about having the NDA doesn't prove conclusively that the deed happened. Betting odds favor that it did.
If Trump used campaign funds to pay her off and didn't disclose it, that's a problem. It's not a problem worthy of a felony, and certainly not 134 years in prison.
Here's a short clip discussing biden's destruction of the US economy...
The selling of even one barrel (let alone 218 million) of our SPR to our leading economic competitor (and strongest & most potential military enemy) China.... is nothing short of treason.
No. It's not a crime. But it's still unclear to me how they're insisting that it's a campaign expense. Evidence of that seems to be as scares as the crime allegedly covered up by the incorrect accounting. They gonna need a lot more Kraken than they've provided. If it were an honest court hearing it.Lot's of people pay for NDA's with their own money which Trump did. It's not a crime. I think it was Dershowitz that said should they then have to record the details of what the NDA was for in the books subject to public records? That would defeat the purpose of an NDA.
Trump was not trying to conceal a crime because it wasn't a crime.
Maybe they are trying to insist that it was a campaign expense because they say the hush money was paid to try and keep it from negatively affecting his campaign.No. It's not a crime. But it's still unclear to me how they're insisting that it's a campaign expense. Evidence of that seems to be as scares as the crime allegedly covered up by the incorrect accounting. They gonna need a lot more Kraken than they've provided. If it were an honest court hearing it.
That's what they're saying, but it can't be proven unless they have some communications between Trump and lawyers saying it. Cohen has claimed it, but he took a plea deal.Maybe they are trying to insist that it was a campaign expense because they say the hush money was paid to try and keep it from negatively affecting his campaign.
They're trying really hard to make it so. Bragg even stated it in the indictment that Trump and Cohen and the editor of the National Enquirer engaged in a "Catch and kill" scheme to handle any embarrassing things from being disclosed that could negatively affect his campaign which included paying money to Stormy and McDougal and a doorman.That's what they're saying, but it can't be proven unless they have some communications between Trump and lawyers saying it. Cohen has claimed it, but he took a plea deal.
Unfortunately it is a multigenerational issue where parents do less and less and schools get deeper and deeper with each generation…In my opinion, biggest problem with kids, is PARENTS.
Parents that don't discipline.
Parents that think all learning is done at school