Big Problems if Trump is Indicted

[Ziggidy]

Let’s tally all this up. They started out right from the get go investigating Trump for allegedly colluding with the Russians to affect an election and HRC was never investigated for the dirty deeds she actually did to try and affect an election and undermine a presidency.

After that didn’t pan out they impeached him not once but twice for good measure.

Now we have the first former president to be indicted with three more potential indictments in the works.

Man the Democrats want to get him out of the way really bad so they can have their way with the country.This is an unprecedented level of an attack on a political opponent.

What comes next? Shoot, stab and burn him?

 

[KG1]

The country is imploding big time, but they prioritize Getting Trump. They do that to distract from the grim reality.

 

[DadSmith]

'I will kill you': Journalist attacked and threatened by alleged CBS crew member outside Trump arraignment in NYC | Blaze Media

A popular video journalist was attacked and threatened by a crew member allegedly working for CBS outside Donald Trump's arraignment in New York City.The man, described as a sound man for CBS by the Post Millennial, is seen on video grabbing the independent journalist, Oren Levy, by the collar...

www.theblaze.com

 

[actaeon277]

'I will kill you': Journalist attacked and threatened by alleged CBS crew member outside Trump arraignment in NYC | Blaze Media

A popular video journalist was attacked and threatened by a crew member allegedly working for CBS outside Donald Trump's arraignment in New York City.The man, described as a sound man for CBS by the Post Millennial, is seen on video grabbing the independent journalist, Oren Levy, by the collar...

www.theblaze.com

Surely a city spending so much energy going after Pres. Trump has its s*** together
Surely

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

View attachment 267810

I see these memes often and they are cringe.

 

[oze]

I see these memes often and they are cringe.

You'll probably be able to purchase that meme on an e-card soon.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Surely a city spending so much energy going after Pres. Trump has its s*** together
Surely

 

[LeftyGunner]

They’re being charged as felonies. He’s technically correct. But can he say with his intellectual integrity intact that the charges were not politically motivated?

Apologies, it was not my intent to infer personal knowledge of the charges, only to try to report what some others were claiming.

I have not made the claim the charges were not politically motivated in any of my previous posts, and I am not making that claim now. I doubt any prosecution is completely devoid of political motivations entirely, and I imagine some are more politically motivated than others.

I am not sure how to measure the amount of political motivation in someone else’s actions but, assuming no prosecution is really 0% politically motivated, where would we draw an appropriate line?

Is a prosecution that is 10% politically motivated acceptable? 25%? 51%?

What about a prosecution that appears overtly politically motivated, but uncovers factual criminal conduct?

Is there a way to investigate politicians for criminal actions without being accused of political motivations? How much credence should be given when those accusations are themselves equally likely to be politically motivated?

I guess I’m comfortable with the appearance of political motivation if the criminal investigation reveals factual criminal behavior...I’m honestly not sure how we could really avoid it, pragmatically speaking.

 

[buckwacker]

Apologies, it was not my intent to infer personal knowledge of the charges, only to try to report what some others were claiming.

I have not made the claim the charges were not politically motivated in any of my previous posts, and I am not making that claim now. I doubt any prosecution is completely devoid of political motivations entirely, and I imagine some are more politically motivated than others.

I am not sure how to measure the amount of political motivation in someone else’s actions but, assuming no prosecution is really 0% politically motivated, where would we draw an appropriate line?

Is a prosecution that is 10% politically motivated acceptable? 25%? 51%?

What about a prosecution that appears overtly politically motivated, but uncovers factual criminal conduct?

Is there a way to investigate politicians for criminal actions without being accused of political motivations? How much credence should be given when those accusations are themselves equally likely to be politically motivated?

I guess I’m comfortable with the appearance of political motivation if the criminal investigation reveals factual criminal behavior...I’m honestly not sure how we could really avoid it, pragmatically speaking.

Why do you do this? You're trying to equivocate on something that's indefensible. This crap will destroy this country, in your lifetime, so it really puzzles me why it doesn't really bother you.

 

[manifest destiny]

Is there a way to investigate politicians for criminal actions without being accused of political motivations?

Very good point. But in this particular instance, Bragg literally campaigned on "Get Trump!" So I believe his motive to be purely political. After all, this issue was reviewed by other prosecutors a they decided to not pursue it. Bragg is dirty.

Is a prosecution that is 10% politically motivated acceptable? 25%? 51%?

No. Not if lady justice is blind.

What about a prosecution that appears overtly politically motivated, but uncovers factual criminal conduct?

That's a very good question/point. I suppose it is similar to the thought "does the end justify the means". Typically my view is no, the end doesn't justify the means. But I suppose there is room for more contemplation. As yet Bragg hasn't demonstrated any crime. He hasn't even referenced the law he claims Trump knowingly violated.

 

[ghitch75]

Apologies, it was not my intent to infer personal knowledge of the charges, only to try to report what some others were claiming.

I have not made the claim the charges were not politically motivated in any of my previous posts, and I am not making that claim now. I doubt any prosecution is completely devoid of political motivations entirely, and I imagine some are more politically motivated than others.

I am not sure how to measure the amount of political motivation in someone else’s actions but, assuming no prosecution is really 0% politically motivated, where would we draw an appropriate line?

Is a prosecution that is 10% politically motivated acceptable? 25%? 51%?

What about a prosecution that appears overtly politically motivated, but uncovers factual criminal conduct?

Is there a way to investigate politicians for criminal actions without being accused of political motivations? How much credence should be given when those accusations are themselves equally likely to be politically motivated?

I guess I’m comfortable with the appearance of political motivation if the criminal investigation reveals factual criminal behavior...I’m honestly not sure how we could really avoid it, pragmatically speaking.

so you won't throw a fit when it is bidens turn????

 

[LeftyGunner]

so you won't throw a fit when it is bidens turn????

No sir, I won’t lose a minute of sleep. Do the Clintons first, though.

 

[DadSmith]

Poll: 3 in 4 Americans Say 'Politics Played a Role' in Trump Indictment

The majority of Americans, including most Democrats, believe "politics played a role" in the indictment of former President Trump, per a poll.

www.breitbart.com

 

[DoggyDaddy]

No sir, I won’t lose a minute of sleep. Do the Clintons first, though.

 

[DadSmith]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/04/trump-charges-34-counts-felony/

Here are the 34 charges against Trump and what they mean

For those like me who don't know all the different charges.

 

[BugI02]

Man the Democrats want to get him out of the way really bad so they can have their way with the country.This is an unprecedented level of an attack on a political opponent.

But I'm being told that DeRomneyis will just step in and pick up the sword and no one will know the difference

It would seem obvious to me that they see Trump as the greater threat

 

[oze]

But I'm being told that DeRomneyis will just step in and pick up the sword and no one will know the difference

It would seem obvious to me that they see Trump as the greater threat

So, we have a thread which essentially points out the hypocrisy and dirty politics and decries the ridiculous behavior of the Dems wrt these charges, and, with a small exception, INGO members supporting Trump in this witch hunt fiasco. Even those who do not otherwise support Trump. And you jump in with an inane name for a potential opponent who has also not said anything negative about Trump during this circus. I you aren't Trump or his ventriloquist dummy, I know who you must be:

 

[KG1]

Whether I am a Trump supporter or not I know one thing. I absolutely do not support the insane amount of political persecution that has been brought to bear against him. That's why I have been so vocal in this thread.

 

[actaeon277]

Rachel Maddow and Liberal Media FREAK OUT After Trump Pulls Chess Move During Indictment Speech​

note: a commenter used a NSFW word.

 

[Route 45]

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s Team Goes Into Damage Control Mode After Getting Exposed for Having a 'Weak Case,' Some Argued

It's all coming undone.

conservativebrief.com