None of these measures were ever going to "stop" the spread. It's only ever been about slowing the transmission rate.
Most of the Karens in my area are really big women. I would not want to throw down with any of them.
One thing to tell people to go away... they don't know everything about everybody. FWIW, my barber cannot wear a mask because of breathing difficulties, COPD, etc. Dad, ditto.
Another thing entirely to intimate something physical if someone "Karens" you about not wearing a mask. They aren't right, but IMO, neither are you.
And, speaking of "true believers", there are at least two sorts.
I'm sure the vaccine is fine, it's not like the CEO is refusing to take it or anything.
I'm sure the vaccine is fine, it's not like the CEO is refusing to take it or anything.
I'm sure the vaccine is fine, it's not like the CEO is refusing to take it or anything.
Jetta suis Texas?
Just like the free lunch program there is no means test for the additional $300/wk.
The payment may increase your income and discourage you seeking a new job, but that doesn't seem to bother anyone.
I too am bothered by the proliferation of school freebies. Aid to Dependent Children (commonly called Welfare) was established to provide basic necessities to low income children.
Then it was duplicated with SNAP (food stamps), payments based on family size. Then it was triplicated with free school lunches.
Then it was quadrupled with summer lunches when school wasn't in session. Then quintupled with covid programs to provide breakfast and lunch delivered to their homes.
BugI02 said:I have watched you mirror the shift of the MSM from death rates to case rates, and will stand by the assertion. What information you choose to present is also vulnerable to bias, as is likewise true for me - but I have no need to 'prove' Sweden's path to be right or wrong, I'm content to wait and see. Shall we look back at this after Thanksgiving? Will that 10 week span be enough to exhibit the 4 to 6 week lag?
SheepDog4Life said:Sure, and I've said that multiple times already, let's wait and see... it is something to absolutely look at and keep an eye on... and my math puts 4 weeks out at Dec 1.
Also note that Sweden is about to impose, for them, pretty severe restrictions. So would you also agree that if 2-3 weeks after those take effect we see a deceleration of cases, that those measures work? With close contact/household spread, even shutting down or mostly shutting down community spread, means it takes a bit longer to "flatten the curve"... about that same Dec 1 time by my math.
And note that I specifically used the word deceleration.. many who don't grock math muse why this doesn't reverse course in a day or in two weeks. For the same reason a model rocket keeps going up (but at a slowing speed) when it's rocket burns out... it doesn't instantly stop in mid-air and fall to the ground.
SheepDog4Life said:BTW, Sweden appears to be reporting about 2 weeks in arrears... what was 1-3 deaths per day now appears to be in the low teens for those same dates two weeks ago... so it doesn't appear that their Dec 1 reporting will be accurate until Dec 15th, but they have what appears to be the start of an upward trend, something like a 5-6 fold increase over a 2-3 week period.
I am so sick and tired of the continued
Covid Covid Covid COVID over sensationalization of it. If the media was concerned about what's going on in this country and put 10% of the effort on reporting what is really going on, there would be a totally different narrative and Trump would be re-elected and given credit for fast tracking what was said could not be done.
Could you imagine Killary being in charge and how un-hinged she would have went off faced with this.