Anti-gunners say...

[Cameramonkey]

Till she pushed a button, and some setting changed, or something broke.
And she gets 5 days off because she did another job.

I used to drive scissor-lifts, and man-lifts.
Then, they required a class and a qual card for it. Didn't matter if I used to do it.
They (company) wouldn't give me the class, because 'my job' didn't need it.
Then they needed me to use them, real important. But I couldn't, because no class and no qual.
So the company sucked up $$$ in losses.


Millwright tells a production guy to help me, hold this, and something happened, or the boss walked by, both guys get time off. For helping.

Guys have been injured, but couldn't report it, because it wasn't their job.

So, yes, IT SEEMS SILLY.
But that's corporations for you.
We had notes all over telling people to be a team player and think outside your job.
And at the same time we had people waiting on hearings because of doing just that.

Apples and oranges. Taking a photo isnt even close to heavy equipment operation.

No. Not trolling. I just don’t understand the cause for upset.

Because it was a simple request that was refused for no good reason. I'd argue an utterly ridiculous, lazy reason. (And I was already p***ed off because they ignored service requirements when staffing. This was years before covid/worker shortages)

But this isnt the place to continue the discussion. Now back on topic.

 

[2A_Tom]

Mods acting out, jacking threads, arguing with members. What has INGO come to.

Reminds me of the bad old days.

Here comes my ban!

Don't worry, I reported this post myself.

 

[jamil]

Apples and oranges. Taking a photo isnt even close to heavy equipment operation.

Because it was a simple request that was refused for no good reason. I'd argue an utterly ridiculous, lazy reason. (And I was already p***ed off because they ignored service requirements when staffing. This was years before covid/worker shortages)

But this isnt the place to continue the discussion. Now back on topic.

I really don’t want to belabor this. I don’t think it’s that important. But how do you know it’s for no good reason? She just works there. Maybe she’s just lazy. Why is that the assumption? Maybe she’s under strict orders never to touch the machine because because she ****ed it up once. Could be lots of reasons. Could be a work policy that makes or doesn’t make sense, but that she has to follow. Maybe she doesn’t know how to work it and is afraid to try.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Maybe this will get the thread back on topic.

When you’re in a mood for a little cringe, this is a good twitter follow.

LOL at the sensitive content cover.

 

[actaeon277]

If a boss says don't touch, then don't touch.

Maybe she was lazy, maybe not

 

[jamil]

Maybe this will get the thread back on topic.

Heretic!

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Your daily dose of cringe.

 

[MRockwell]

only in Jersey...

 

[bgcatty]

Those idiots in NJ can stuff it! There is no discussion possible with the anti gun zealots in NJ. The libtards in government in NJ are hopelessly lost in their cosmic utopian nightmares. I do not know what can be done to change that reality given the sheeples who vote for these idiots.

 

[MRockwell]

 

[defaultdotxbe]

only in Jersey...

Of course he's OK with it, it's a feature, not a bug.

 

[Cameramonkey]

Of course he's OK with it, it's a feature, not a bug.

Exactly. If he cant outright ban the gun, he will just make it impossible to carry it by making the laws so ridiculous its impractical.

Just like NY trying to claim virtually every inch of public space is a sensitive space and thereby prohibited. Which results in "if you already have a gun in your home, you can keep it as a home defense weapon. But you cant take it to a range. If you move you will have to hand it over to the police because it will be impossible to transport it to your new apartment since the sidewalk outside is a sensitive space."

Like the clowns that say "we cant ban your guns so we will instead ban the magazine because since the magazine isnt a firearm, its not protected by the 2A. So sure, you can carry that awkwardly loaded single shot Glock with no magazine. Good luck with that.

 

[actaeon277]

You're paranoid. 'We' don't want to take your guns.

But if you don't give them to us, we're gonna kill you.



Yup. Seems just the way they think.

 

[jamil]

only in Jersey...

It's not for any crime-reducing purpose really. It's just punishing people who carry firearms. You don't want to accidentally break the law while walking your dog? Then don't carry a firearm.

 

[jamil]

That's a woman who has never asked her self if she's full of ****.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Your daily cringe.

 

[actaeon277]

Well, it's a California 'expert' so...

 

[KLB]

Well, it's a California 'expert' so...

Former Marine Col.

 

[Cameramonkey]

That one is actually being discussed here in detail.

Expert testifies that a single round from an AR-15 can sever the upper body from the lower body

Expert testifies that a single round from an AR-15 can sever the upper body from the lower body Col. Craig Tucker has testified that a single round from an AR-15 “is capable of severing the upper body from the lower body, or decapitation.” Furthermore, it’s useless as a defensive weapon, except...

www.indianagunowners.com

 

[actaeon277]

Former Marine Col.

Lot of officers don't know a barrel from a stock.
That's why many of them are NEVER around a gun.