Well, when the facts don't support your cause (anti-gunner's cause), then you throw the facts out.Apparently, there was a new thing going around FB where anti gunners tried to make the case that the Second Amendment reference to a “well-regulated militia” was a restriction in 1791 to one musket and 24 bullets. The actual fact of the matter is that it was the minimum requirement, not the maximum.
As a matter of fact, they can't even get their dates right for their claims. That minimum requirement wasn't even a thing until a year later when the Uniform Militia Act of 1792, was passed by congress a year after the claim asserts. The stupid fools will try any angle.
Fact check: Militia law in 1792 included minimum weapon requirements, but no maximums
There were minimums, but not maximums, for the number of weapons militiamen had to own in a 1792 law according to an expert.www.usatoday.com