I'm not 100% sure on this particular situation but brandishing a firearm that is loaded is considered a felony......
Indiana has laws against pointing a firearm at someone, but no laws against brandishing.
I'm not 100% sure on this particular situation but brandishing a firearm that is loaded is considered a felony......
There are too many "what ifs" in this particular question to answer it fully and cleanly, but I will touch on a few things.
Mistake #1. You won't always have time to "rack a round". Glocks are meant to be carried in Condition 1 (round in chamber).
Better idea would be to lock the doors, start the car, and start driving.
Maybe if they were standing still on a square range and they were made of cardboard. I don't think 15 rounds would be adequate on 4 actual attackers.
That depends. Do you feel that your life is in imminent danger of death or grave bodily injury? Or do you simply think they want to smash your windows, key your car, and scare you?
Depends on which one is actively trying to kill or maim you.
IMHO...simply cussing at you and otherwise verbally harassing you would not be enough for me, sitting in your jury, to acquit you. I think what is missing from your scenario are threats of physical injury, display of weapons, proximity of them to you, etc.
I like esrice's answer best so far. We have to learn that the gun isn't the only answer. If you see them waiting at the car, call the police. If they follow you, call the police. If you are really concerned that they are going to continue to go after you then file for a protective order. It really doesn't matter if you're legally justified to shoot or not; IF you have other options, use them first. You don't want it on your conscience to shoot somebody and you don't want to spend the time and money defending yourself in court. The gun is the absolute last option, as in they are advancing on you NOW with intent to seriously injure you and you cannot possibly escape. Honestly, I don't care if 25 men armed with bats are coming after me, if I can run away I'm going to do it rather than shooting at them.
Just a question for fodder......
Why do you not carry with one in the chamber?
Until it's loaded, it's merely a paper weight or a club if they pull you away from your vehicle before you have a chance to rack the slide. Keep it ready to be fired, it will lessen your chance for a lot of potential things from happening (hand slipping while pulling slide back, round not chambering right, ect..ect..).
Now for the rest of it....IANAL and I did not stay at a Holiday Inn last night, but coming at you cussing, does justify using deadly force. You'd better be able to use the words "I feared for my life" and be able to back it up.
Agreed, IF they are really there just to beat him up or whatever. Doubtful. They are there to intimidate and if you keep your cool it is unlikely they will escalate- just like playground bullies.
Agreed. In the game of life there is no second chances when it come to life and death. They outnumbered you and you did not know if any of them were armed. If you truly feared for your safety those are not good odds. Best not to push them unless absolutely necessary.
Castle Doctrine= No duty to retreat. I thought you knew that by now? Also, how do you KNOW they are unarmed? Haven't you seen people trampled to death? They were trampled by unarmed people...
Take this advice. Esrice knows what he is talking about on all accounts.
Like has been said, we do not have a brandishing law, what you are thinking of is it is a misdemeanor to point an unloaded firearm and a felony to point a loaded firearm at an innocent person. Does NOT apply to self defense.
Some people don't like to be pushed around by guys who talk big but don't back it up. Some people take the safe route and avoid confrontation. I don't believe either avenue to be wrong as if you are a law abiding person you have every right to be where you are and there is no reason bullies should be able to change that. I think you can tell which I would choose.
Actually this would fall under the premise of a mob action. You would be completely within your rights to shoot any of them including one not active in the assault. If after warning them they still continue towards you blast the crap out of all of them until the threat is eliminated. In a mob action there does not have to be a weapon present. If you need a link to the specific case I will find it for you when I get to my pc.
Driving to PD and filing a complaint and getting paper on them is definitely not a bad idea. Then....when they "violate" that order and you do what is required....you'll be on better ground.
I am a lifeguard at the local city pool. As some of you know if youve ever been to the pool youll have scum and thugs come and give you **** all day. This guy in particular gives me crap everyday. He's 26.... tatted up and has no job. I gave him a few warnings like i always do but today he went over the edge. Him and his buddies started harrassing me while i was on duty and i said to stop and then they completly start dropping F bombs and calling me a *****. If that wasnt enough the bigger guy says if i tell them what to do again he was gonna smash my f ing head in when i got off work.
You sure you're a lifeguard and not a moderator?
Hmm? I dont get it...
IMHO...simply cussing at you and otherwise verbally harassing you would not be enough for me, sitting in your jury, to acquit you. I think what is missing from your scenario are threats of physical injury, display of weapons, proximity of them to you, etc.
Because everything you described in the paragraph I quoted sounds word-for-word what being a moderator is like.
Because everything you described in the paragraph I quoted sounds word-for-word what being a moderator is like.
have you ever had 4 guys get in your face yelling obscenities at you? it's a pretty nerve-wracking experience.
even if they were not threatening you directly (though in this case one of them threatened to bash his head in), they certainly are implying violence via harassment and intimidation.
IANAL, but their freedom of speech only extends so far. And I for one, having been in a similar situation, think it is quite reasonable to be in fear of my life. ymmv
2 or more men and disparity of force would have come into the picture..yes you are allowed to use deadly force if you are outnumbered..however it would be argued that you could have called the police and had them standby while you exited the premises although the supreme court has ruled that the police have no duty to protect
Yes, you are in the wrong, you must be in your car and they must try to gain entry, they are going to have to get the door open or smash the window. Get in, lock the door, call the police, have your weapon at the ready and see what happens from there.
Stop carrying with out a round in the chamber, this will get you killed, its a Glock, its made to be carried 15+1, just point and shoot.
I like esrice's answer best so far. We have to learn that the gun isn't the only answer. If you see them waiting at the car, call the police. If they follow you, call the police. If you are really concerned that they are going to continue to go after you then file for a protective order. It really doesn't matter if you're legally justified to shoot or not; IF you have other options, use them first. You don't want it on your conscience to shoot somebody and you don't want to spend the time and money defending yourself in court. The gun is the absolute last option, as in they are advancing on you NOW with intent to seriously injure you and you cannot possibly escape. Honestly, I don't care if 25 men armed with bats are coming after me, if I can run away I'm going to do it rather than shooting at them.
When I first started carrying I was not comfortable carrying with one in the chamber either. It has been suggested in this thread, but a good class would do you well.And starting tomorow its gonna be loaded and ready to go. Im just gonna rack it and put it up.