I thought the same thing when I saw this tat.Sometimes I wonder how many of the tattoos we see on these models are temporary. I get it; ink is a personal decision and folks are only limited by theirs and other's imagination.
But a tattoo of an AR15? Hmm.... I mean do you guys think she is a real shooter? Or a model?
Sometimes I wonder how many of the tattoos we see on these models are temporary. I get it; ink is a personal decision and folks are only limited by theirs and other's imagination.
But a tattoo of an AR15? Hmm.... I mean do you guys think she is a real shooter? Or a model?
Sometimes I wonder how many of the tattoos we see on these models are temporary. I get it; ink is a personal decision and folks are only limited by theirs and other's imagination.
But a tattoo of an AR15? Hmm.... I mean do you guys think she is a real shooter? Or a model?
I thought the same thing when I saw this tat.
My guess is a model.
The pic has too much "pic gear" and "sexy cloths" and that dumb "let's get her dirty/bloody" look. Looks overall so fake. Meh...
A plain Jane in everyday cloths holding a firearm would ha e more appeal then this image. No offense to the model she has a nice figure but the everything else just runs it.
I believe she is Orin Julie, and she served in the IDF.Sometimes I wonder how many of the tattoos we see on these models are temporary. I get it; ink is a personal decision and folks are only limited by theirs and other's imagination.
But a tattoo of an AR15? Hmm.... I mean do you guys think she is a real shooter? Or a model?