I doubt that anyone here really cares where she chooses to put her guns but putting them in the backround like that in published pictures seems to me like she is courting needless drama.
Yes, and girls in short skirts are just asking for it...
I doubt that anyone here really cares where she chooses to put her guns but putting them in the backround like that in published pictures seems to me like she is courting needless drama.
Or who is the lawmaker with the painting of Chairman Mao over his fireplace?It was a zoom meeting about the second amendment. Do we pick apart everyone else’s back drops or only when it involves guns? I have seen a lot of dangerous books and bust statues on display in this same manner. And they display them proudly, so I see no problem with this at all.
Did she take off her kit? Why is she wearing a drop leg holster?Needless drama?
She was elected as a gun toting 2A proponent. I would say the needless drama are coming from those questioning her motives.
I think the drop leg holster was a work related thing. Her and her waitresses open carried and then some. Part of the ambiance at Shooter's Grill in Rifle, CO.Did she take off her kit? Why is she wearing a drop leg holster?
IMHO both terms are significantly misused these days...Wait - someone flippantly throws around the term fascist, and your answer is to flippantly throw around the term communist?
Maybe she's wearing them because she's 5' tall?I question her choice of footwear. Those wedges are HIDEOUS.
Yeah, pretty much.I'm not a Twitters person, but I scrolled down and read quite a few of those posts. Is everyone on Twitter that ****ing stupid?
If the shoe fits, and the D party has been infested with actual card-carrying communists since Red Frank was in office--you know, they guy who consigned half of Europe to a communist living hell.Wait - someone flippantly throws around the term fascist, and your answer is to flippantly throw around the term communist?
How so? On one side, anyine to the right if Fidel Castro magically becomes a fascist. On the other, we are accused of exaggeration/hyperbole for calling scrupulous disciples if Marx, Lenin, Mao, Stalin, and Che Guevara communists.IMHO both terms are significantly misused these days...
I'm not a Twitters person, but I scrolled down and read quite a few of those posts. Is everyone on Twitter that ****ing stupid?
The side actually performing and promoting the fascist and communist type of activities is describing the other with the same terms...typical of propaganda campaigns to mislead, misdirect, misquote, misinform, etc. Make your own judgements and observations as to which side I am referring too, but the terms are misused constantly in the media and on social media either by people representing their own agendas, or just by sheer ignorance. Even worse is the "guilt by association" being thrown about and heavily influencing through the national news networks and the obvious double-standards being applied.How so? On one side, anyine to the right if Fidel Castro magically becomes a fascist. On the other, we are accused of exaggeration/hyperbole for calling scrupulous disciples if Marx, Lenin, Mao, Stalin, and Che Guevara communists.