I didn't think it was a difficult concept to grasp. If there's some saline\vax conspiratorial test program being implemented on the masses, and the proposed way to determine those who'd had the actual vax was an antibody test, it seems unvaxxed recovered covid infected might screw up the data a bit.No comprende. In the idea/post chain we're discussing, why would you care?
Read it again (for the first time?). The two overlapping intervals were chosen when Delta was <50% and then >50% and about paragraph 6 or so, they actually compare some of the differences between the twoI reported that article earlier.
What it fails to consider is where we are now with delta. What is happening today is what many people are concerned with.
You would be looking for vaccinated people exhibiting no antibodies, de facto proof that their vaccination could not have contained a vaccineI didn't think it was a difficult concept to grasp. If there's some saline\vax conspiratorial test program being implemented on the masses, and the proposed way to determine those who'd had the actual vax was an antibody test, it seems unvaxxed recovered covid infected might screw up the data a bit.
Point of orderAhhh...personal insults are always so charming.
So if someone "vaxxed" with saline also had and recovered from covid? What I thought was proposed was an antibody test to determine who'd had the actual vax and who'd had the saline. That slight wrinkle could skew the data just a little.You would be looking for vaccinated people exhibiting no antibodies, de facto proof that their vaccination could not have contained a vaccine
If someone had covid and recovered, they would exhibit antibodies
How is saline ending up in viles labeled as covid vaccine?
Can anyone solve the mystery of this ordeal?
Agreed. The question would be was it skewed enough to matter. All you really need to 'prove' the conspiracy is a number of cases who believe they were vaxxed but have no antibodiesSo if someone "vaxxed" with saline also had and recovered from covid? What I thought was proposed was an antibody test to determine who'd had the actual vax and who'd had the saline. That slight wrinkle could skew the data just a little.
I haven’t read the stories, but was wondering if those who had could say…was this one manufacturer’s “vaccine” or a mix of makers? Curious if it was a manufacturing snafu or at the injection site.How is saline ending up in viles labeled as covid vaccine?
Your job sucks.Point of order
Is it possible for ideas to be insulting but not personal?
Then why is it 'my' job being singled out? Seems pretty personalYour job sucks.
Not personal.
Ah, my mistake. I didn't realize you were talking about proving\disproving the conspiracy. I thought you were referring to the gathering of data for the conspiratorial mass experiment.Agreed. The question would be was it skewed enough to matter. All you really need to 'prove' the conspiracy is a number of cases who believe they were vaxxed but have no antibodies
Like with voter fraud, it should be enough to prove it happened. At that point ANY is too much
Happening globally at the same time...I haven’t read the stories, but was wondering if those who had could say…was this one manufacturer’s “vaccine” or a mix of makers? Curious if it was a manufacturing snafu or at the injection site.
You are the ONLY one that does that job?Then why is it 'my' job being singled out? Seems pretty personal
Not sure if somebody would find something aimed more diffusely, like 'baseball needs to be put in a freezer somewhere until they find a cure', to be actually insulting
My suspicion is saying PERSONAL insults is redundant