Good question. Got an answer to either one?Are vaccinated and carrier independent?
Good question. Got an answer to either one?Are vaccinated and carrier independent?
YesGood question. Got an answer to either one?
The vaccinated can and do carry and get infected. I don't know about the immune as far as carrying but I'd be surprised if they can't carry it.Good question. Got an answer to either one?
I would think carrying it would be independent but have no idea. Buckwacker knows. But he ain't talkin'The vaccinated can and do carry and get infected. I don't know about the immune as far as carrying but I'd be surprised if they can't carry it.
https://thebl.com/world-news/no-mor...as-country-removes-pandemic-restrictions.html
It's over, it's been over.
The ONLY REASON it's still being carried by the media and politicians is because the COVID cash cow is being milked.
It's a blank check for "emergency spending" pet projects and social control.
The site removed it already
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I gave a fos answer to a fos question.I would think carrying it would be independent but have no idea. Buckwacker knows. But he ain't talkin'
So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.I gave a fos answer to a fos question.
So you're saying you never have answers?So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.
My questions are usually tough.
He made some excellent points. My belief is that Fauci and other decision-makers have had no idea how to stop this virus. They’ve thrown everything at the wall and instead of admitting they didn’t know and it wasn’t working, they pressed on. I think the vaccine is sort of their last gasp effort to save face. They’re pushing this thing as hard as they can so they can “look we had it handled but ‘those people’ wouldn’t do their part.” It’s the only thing that makes sense to me. They sell the vaccine as the answer and then blame us when it doesn’t work. I’ve heard people here say it’s about control, or some great reset, or population control, or money, or whatever else. To me that implies a MASSIVE amount of global cooperation that just doesn’t seem possible. From heads of every country right down to your local medical professionals and politicians. I just don’t see that as being a viable plan. I think they just refuse to admit that, even as advanced as we are, we couldn’t stop the virus. That only requires people to trust that they know best, which is a lot more likely than a huge conspiracy.
So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.
My questions are usually tough.
I’m not sure what you’re asking.Do I have a decision maker?
The war against medical choice continues locally
Woman suing Indianapolis hospital that refuses to give her mother ivermectin for COVID treatment
The lawsuit was filed in Marion County Circuit Court by a daughter whose mother is hospitalized at Ascension St. Vincent on 86th Street in Indianapolis.www.wthr.com
“Therefore, they are taking a hardline, a correct hardline, to say we do not believe this will benefit you. We believe it may harm you and therefore we are perhaps compassionately saying no."
No.So you're saying you never have answers?
I don't find your questions that tough.
There are several here who seem to know the answer to lots more questions than I do.Throwing out questions that no one has answers to isn't tough, especially lately.
The part that stood out to me was the argument about the court being put in the position to say they know better than the hospital. Well, that’s not really accurate. The court is deciding whether a person should be given a medication they want, and was prescribed by another doctor, over the objections of the hospital. This isn’t a doctor saying someone is being a kook and they’re professionally obligated to overrule them for their own good. It’s a doctor disagreeing with another doctor. It WAS prescribed, but they’re refusing to honor it.from the article:
Lying sack of . Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the market. There is very little, if any chance that it will do harm. At most it won't help with the treatment, but there is no real reason to not administer it. Except politics.