I recently read the book his son wrote. It's very good.Some people do a lot more than they say.
Leon Gary Plauché
Why, Gary, Why?
After reading it, the title may be the dumbest question anyone has EVER asked.
I recently read the book his son wrote. It's very good.Some people do a lot more than they say.
Leon Gary Plauché
The title comes from an officer right after the shooting. When running up to take custody of him after he popped the kiddie diddler he was yelling why, Gary, why?I recently read the book his son wrote. It's very good.
Why, Gary, Why?
After reading it, the title may be the dumbest question anyone has EVER asked.
I recall watching this on the evening news.
Gary ensured that pedophile would have a recidivism rate of 0.00%
I recall watching this on the evening news.
Gary ensured that pedophile would have a recidivism rate of 0.00%
His defense attorneys say he's innocent. Good enough for me. Case dismissed.
I'll have to disagree, what Allen's attorney says carries no more or less weight than what the prosecutor says. There is no publicly available evidence either way. And I don't believe his attorney stated that he is innocent, he stated that Allen says he is innocent.Allen's lawyer saying Allen is innocent offers greater proof of innocence than the prosecution has provided for his guilt. That is to say there is no public evidence at all. If the sealed details are because there exist others involved, they better get to arresting the others.
That is to say there is no public evidence at all.
There is no publicly available evidence either way.
That is to say there is no public evidence at all.
Innocent men have been arrested and charged before, and some convicted. I'm not saying he is innocent, and I'm also not saying he's guilty. Without seeing the evidence I honestly have no idea.Yep, they just put a bunch of names in a hat and drew one. Apply purple where needed.
Just that there is supposed to be a presumption of innocence. Allen may be 100% culpable for the death of these two children. But until evidence is presented, his claim of innocence would necessarily carry more weight.Yes, I was agreeing with you on that. But since we have no evidence to judge, how/why are you giving greater weight to the words of one over the other?
While I agree that there is a presumption of innocence in court, I'll have to disagree that his claim carries more weight. It is up to the prosecution to disprove his claim though.Just that there is supposed to be a presumption of innocence. Allen may be 100% culpable for the death of these two children. But until evidence is presented, his claim of innocence would necessarily carry more weight.
Isn't that what the presumption of innocense means?While I agree that there is a presumption of innocence in court, I'll have to disagree that his claim carries more weight. It is up to the prosecution to disprove his claim though.
Well obviously evidence has been presented that led to a PC affidavit and resulted in a warrant.Just that there is supposed to be a presumption of innocence. Allen may be 100% culpable for the death of these two children. But until evidence is presented, his claim of innocence would necessarily carry more weight.
I get what you are saying, and yes in the courtroom. But not in the courtroom I give them both equal weight. In the courtroom the only thing that matters is the evidence, not the He did it/I didn't do it from the attorneys.Isn't that what the presumption of innocense means?
If the prosecution proves beyond a reasonable doubt he is guilty, then it no longer holds more weight.
I don't know if a warrant was ever issued, they don't need one in a felony case. But yes they had to present evidence to get the judge to accept the PC affidavit. But the judge only heard from one side, the defense didn't get to rebut the evidence the prosecutor presented or present their own evidence.Well obviously evidence has been presented that led to a PC affidavit and resulted in a warrant.